Traumatic injury clinical trial evaluating tranexamic acid in children (TIC-TOC): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
Authors:
- for the TIC-TOC Collaborators of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research NetworkFNfor the TIC-TOC Collaborators of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network
- Daniel K. NishijimaDNDaniel K. Nishijima
- John VanBurenJVJohn VanBuren
- Hilary A. HewesHHHilary A. Hewes
- Sage R. MyersSMSage R. Myers
- Rachel M. StanleyRSRachel M. Stanley
- P. David AdelsonPAP. David Adelson
- Sarah E. BarnhardSBSarah E. Barnhard
- Matthew BobinskiMBMatthew Bobinski
- Simona GhettiSGSimona Ghetti
- James F. HolmesJHJames F. Holmes
- Ian RobertsIRIan Roberts
Open Access
- 30 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 19 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Trauma is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children in the United States. The antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid (TXA) improves survival in adults with traumatic hemorrhage, however, the drug has not been evaluated in a clinical trial in severely injured children. We designed the Traumatic Injury Clinical Trial Evaluating Tranexamic Acid in Children (TIC-TOC) trial to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a confirmatory clinical trial that evaluates the effects of TXA in children with severe trauma and hemorrhagic injuries. Children with severe trauma and evidence of hemorrhagic torso or brain injuries will be randomized to one of three arms: (1) TXA dose A (15 mg/kg bolus dose over 20 min, followed by 2 mg/kg/hr infusion over 8 h), (2) TXA dose B (30 mg/kg bolus dose over 20 min, followed by 4 mg/kg/hr infusion over 8 h), or (3) placebo. We will use permuted-block randomization by injury type: hemorrhagic brain injury, hemorrhagic torso injury, and combined hemorrhagic brain and torso injury. The trial will be conducted at four pediatric Level I trauma centers. We will collect the following outcome measures: global functioning as measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) and Pediatric Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E Peds), working memory (digit span test), total amount of blood products transfused in the initial 48 h, intracranial hemorrhage progression at 24 h, coagulation biomarkers, and adverse events (specifically thromboembolic events and seizures). This multicenter trial will provide important preliminary data and assess the feasibility of conducting a confirmatory clinical trial that evaluates the benefits of TXA in children with severe trauma and hemorrhagic injuries to the torso and/or brain. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02840097 . Registered on 14 July 2016.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R34HL135214)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (U24TR001597)
- Maternal and Child Health Bureau (U03MC00008, U03MC00001, U03MC00003, U03MC00006, U03MC00007, U03MC22684, U03MC22685)
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thrombolysis in Pediatric Stroke StudyStroke, 2015
- Tranexamic acid in pediatric trauma: why not?Critical Care, 2014
- Intraoperative tranexamic acid in pediatric bloodless cardiac surgeryAsian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, 2014
- The Efficacy of Antifibrinolytic Drugs in Children Undergoing Noncardiac SurgeryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2014
- Admission rapid thrombelastography delivers real-time “actionable” data in pediatric traumaJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2013
- SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical TrialsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2013
- Effect of tranexamic acid on mortality in patients with traumatic bleeding: prespecified analysis of data from randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2012
- Efficacy of tranexamic acid in paediatric cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysisEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2012
- The MGTX experience: Challenges in planning and executing an international, multicenter clinical trialJournal of Neuroimmunology, 2008
- What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agenciesTrials, 2006