Preferences for labour regulation: endowments versus beliefs
- 7 March 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Economic Policy
- Vol. 39 (119) , 549-606
Abstract
SUMMARY: Are preferences for labour regulations driven by individuals’ own endowments or their beliefs? To address this question, we conducted a cross-country survey on people’s opinions on employment protection legislation – an area where reform has proven to be difficult and personal interests is at stake. We find that individuals’ beliefs contribute two to three times more than their own endowments and personal pay-offs. A randomized information treatment confirms that beliefs can explain views about regulations, but beliefs can also change with new information. Our results are robust to several checks, including to alternative estimation techniques and samples.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- How issue framing shapes trade attitudes: Evidence from a multi-country survey experimentJournal of International Economics, 2021
- Labor market concerns and support for immigrationJournal of Public Economics, 2020
- BEYOND THE STARSJournal of Economic Surveys, 2019
- FAMILY VALUES AND THE REGULATION OF LABORJournal of the European Economic Association, 2015
- CIVIL SOCIETY AND THE STATE: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN COOPERATION AND MINIMUM WAGE REGULATIONJournal of the European Economic Association, 2011
- Civic Virtue and Labor Market InstitutionsAmerican Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2009
- Job Protection: The Macho HypothesisOxford Review of Economic Policy, 2006
- Fairness and RedistributionAmerican Economic Review, 2005
- The Regulation of LaborThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Employment protectionLabour Economics, 2001