Outcomes of Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Managed With Genomic Sequencing Classifier
- 28 February 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Endocrine Society in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Vol. 109 (12) , e2231-e2239
Abstract
Context: Molecular testing can refine the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology to decrease unnecessary diagnostic surgery. Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules managed with Afirma genomic sequencing classifier (GSC) testing. Methods: Adult patients who underwent a biopsy at 3 major academic centers between July 2017 and June 2021 with Bethesda III or IV cytology were included. All patients had surgery or minimum follow-up of 1 year ultrasound surveillance. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of GSC in Bethesda III and IV nodules. Results: The median nodule size of the 834 indeterminate nodules was 2.1 cm and the median follow-up was 23 months. GSC sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV across all institutions were 95%, 81%, 50%, and 99% for Bethesda III nodules and 94%, 82%, 65%, and 98% for Bethesda IV nodules, respectively. The overall false-negative rate was 2%. The NPV of GSC in thyroid nodules with oncocytic predominance was 100% in Bethesda III nodules and 98% in Bethesda IV nodules. However, the PPV of oncocytic nodules was low (17% in Bethesda III nodules and 45% in Bethesda IV nodules). Only 22% of thyroid nodules with benign GSC results grew during surveillance. Conclusion: GSC is a key tool for managing patients with indeterminate cytology, including the higher-risk Bethesda IV category. GSC-benign thyroid nodules can be observed similarly to thyroid nodules with benign cytology.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Thyroid NeoplasmsEndocrine Pathology, 2022
- Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier vs gene expression classifier in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: An institutional experienceDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2021
- Effectiveness of Molecular Testing Techniques for Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid NodulesJAMA Oncology, 2021
- Diagnostic performances of the Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier in comparison with the Gene Expression Classifier: A meta‐analysisCancer Cytopathology, 2020
- Exploring the Inter-observer Agreement Among the Members of the Italian Consensus for the Classification and Reporting of Thyroid CytologyEndocrine Pathology, 2020
- Hurthle cell predominance impacts results of Afirma gene expression classifier and ThyroSeq molecular panel performance in indeterminate thyroid nodulesDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2019
- Performance of a Genomic Sequencing Classifier for the Preoperative Diagnosis of Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid NodulesJAMA Surgery, 2018
- Thyroid Ultrasound Reporting Lexicon: White Paper of the ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) CommitteeJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2015
- Epidemiology of thyroid nodulesBest Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2008
- Does Hurthle cell lesion/neoplasm predict malignancy more than follicular lesion/neoplasm on thyroid fine‐needle aspiration?Diagnostic Cytopathology, 2006