Toxicological characterization of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene, its transformation products, and two nitramine explosives
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Vol. 26 (6) , 1090-1099
Abstract
The soil and groundwater of former ordnance plants and their dumping sites have often been highly contaminated with the explosive 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (2,4,6-TNT) leading to a potential hazard for humans and the environment. Further hazards can arise from metabolites of transformation, by-products of the manufacturing process, or incomplete combustion. This work examines the toxicity of polar nitro compounds relative to their parent compound 2,4,6-TNT using four different ecotoxicological bioassays (algae growth inhibition test, daphnids immobilization test, luminescence inhibition test, and cell growth inhibition test), three genotoxicological assays (umu test, NM2009 test, and SOS Chromotest), and the Ames fluctuation test for detection of mutagenicity. For this study, substances typical for certain steps of degradation/transformation of 2,4,6-TNT were chosen for investigation. This work determines that the parent compounds 2,4,6-TNT and 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene are the most toxic substances followed by 3,5-dinitrophenol, 3,5-dinitroaniline and 4-amino-2-nitrotoluene. Less toxic are the direct degradation products of 2,4,6-TNT like 2,4-dinitrotoluene, 2,6-dinitrotoluene, 2-amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene, and 4-amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene. A weak toxic potential was observed for 2,4,6-trinitrobenzoic acid, 2,4-diamino-6-nitrotoluene, 2,4-dinitrotoluene-5-sulfonic acid, and 2,6-diamino-4-nitrotoluene. Octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine and hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine show no hint of acute toxicity. Based on the results of this study, we recommend expanding future monitoring programs of not only the parent substances but also potential metabolites based on conditions at the contaminated sites and to use bioassays as tools for estimating the toxicological potential directly by testing environmental samples. Site-specific protocols should be developed. If hazardous substances are found in relevant concentrations, action should be taken to prevent potential risks for humans and the environment. Analyses can then be used to prioritise reliable estimates of risk.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genotoxicity of nitrosulfonic acids, nitrobenzoic acids, and nitrobenzylalcohols, pollutants commonly found in ground water near ammunition facilitiesEnvironmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 2005
- Analysis of highly polar compounds in groundwater samples from ammunition waste sites. Part I—Characterization of the pollutant spectrumMagnetic Resonance in Chemistry, 2005
- Further development of the β‐lactamase MutaGen assay and evaluation by comparison with Ames fluctuation tests and the umu testEnvironmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 2005
- Fate and metabolism of [15N]2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in soilEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2004
- Biotransformation of Explosives by the Old Yellow Enzyme Family of FlavoproteinsApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004
- Screening for Soil Toxicity and Mutagenicity Using Luminescent Bacteria—A Case Study of the Explosive 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT)Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2002
- Biological Degradation of 2,4,6-TrinitrotolueneMicrobiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2001
- Determination of Aromatic Amines in Ground and Waste Water by Two New Derivatization MethodsInternational Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 1999
- Metabolism of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene by Pseudomonas sp. JLR11Environmental Science & Technology, 1998
- Biological Treatment of TNT-Contaminated Soil. 1. Anaerobic Cometabolic Reduction and Interaction of TNT and Metabolites with Soil ComponentsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1998