Three-Dimensional Power: A Discussion of Steven Lukes' Power: A Radical View
Author:
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Studies Review
- Vol. 4 (2) , 136-145
Abstract
Lukes' third dimension of power exists where people are subject to domination and acquiesce in that domination. The intentional stance allows us to predict and explain others' behaviour in ways that those agents may not recognise. It denies agents' privileged access to their own reasons for actions. Using the intentional stance we can understand how agents may acquiesce in their own domination. We can also make distinctions between those who dominate knowingly and those who dominate without realising they do so. It allows us to distinguish morally such cases and to understand the power structure without falling into the Foucaultian trap of seeing all social relationships in the same relativistic light and where all – dominant and dominated alike – are subject to the same power relations and moral responsibility.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is it Rational to Vote? Five Types of Answer and a SuggestionThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2005
- The Construction of RightsAmerican Political Science Review, 2003
- A Behavioral Model of TurnoutAmerican Political Science Review, 2003
- Social mechanisms without black boxes1998
- Divided by a Common Language: Political Theory and the Concept of PowerPolitics, 1997
- Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention AccountAmerican Sociological Review, 1996
- Structural instability of the coreJournal of Mathematical Economics, 1986
- Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting ModelsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1979
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functionsJournal of Economic Theory, 1975
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General ResultEconometrica, 1973