Risk Factors for Poor Dental Arch Relationships in Young Children Born with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 111 (2) , 586-593
Abstract
To identify risk factors for poor dental arch relationships in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate in the United Kingdom, the authors performed a cross-sectional outcome study with retrospective data capture of treatment histories in children under the care of 44 cleft teams in the United Kingdom. The study sample comprised 238 children born with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate between April 1, 1989, and March 31, 1991, who were between 5.0 and 7.7 years of age (mean age, 6.5 years) at the time of data collection. The Five-Year-Old Index was used to rank dental arch relationships from dental study models. Velopharyngeal insufficiency was assessed with the use of the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech. An independent panel recorded surgical treatment histories from the clinical notes. There was no association between the technique and the timing of primary repair, the experience of the surgeon, or presurgical orthopedics and dental arch relationships. Secondary velopharyngeal surgery was independently associated with poor outcome (OR, 4.14; 95 percent CI, 1.6 to 10.7; p = 0.003). Primary nasal repair was protective (OR, 0.47; 95 percent CI, 0.23 to 0.93; p = 0.031) against poor dental arch relationships. Secondary velopharyngeal surgery and primary nasal repair were found to be independently associated with dental arch relationship outcomes in young children with unilateral cleft lip and palate in the United Kingdom. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111: 586, 2003.)Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cleft Lip and Palate Care in the United Kingdom—The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 1: Background and MethodologyThe Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 2001
- Cleft Lip and Palate Treated by Presurgical Orthopedics, Gingivoperiosteoplasty, and Lip Adhesion (POPLA) Compared with Previous Lip Adhesion Method: A Preliminary Study of Serial Dental CastsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1999
- The Effect of Surgeon Experience on Velopharyngeal Functional Outcome following Palatoplasty: Is There a Learning Curve?Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1998
- The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Cleft Lip and Palate Study.British Journal of Orthodontics, 1998
- A model of practice for the management of velopharyngeal dysfunctionBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1996
- The Influence of Pharyngeal Flap on Facial Growth:Long Term Results in the Patients with Isolated Cleft PalateScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 1994
- Facial Growth After Pharyngeal Flap Surgery in Cleft Palate Patients: A Five-Year Longitudinal StudyScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 1993
- Late Results of Primary VeloplastyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1984
- The Timing of Hard Palate RepairScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1974
- Growth of the palatal shelves of post-alveolar cleft palate infants. Effects of stimulation appliancesBritish Dental Journal, 1972