Technology-supported student interaction in post-secondary education: A meta-analysis of designed versus contextual treatments
Authors:
- 1 May 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Computers & Education
- Vol. 96, 15-28
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- An exploration of bias in meta-analysis: the case of technology integration research in higher educationJournal of Computing in Higher Education, 2014
- It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classroomsComputers & Education, 2014
- Are contextual and designed student–student interaction treatments equally effective in distance education?Distance Education, 2012
- Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practiceJournal of Computing in Higher Education, 2011
- A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysisResearch Synthesis Methods, 2010
- A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance EducationReview of Educational Research, 2009
- Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaborationDistance Education, 2006
- Getting the Mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for InteractionThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2003
- Cognitive effects of an authentic computer-supported, problem-based learning environmentInstructional Science, 2002
- Sharing Our Toys:Cooperative Learning Versus Collaborative LearningChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 1995