Short (35-cm) versus long (60-cm) flexible sigmoidoscopy: a comparison of findings and tolerance in asymptomatic patients screened for colorectal neoplasia
Authors:
- Richard A. DubowRDRichard A. Dubow
- Ronald M. KatonRKRonald M. Katon
- Kent G. BennerKBKent G. Benner
- Cindy M. van DijkCDCindy M. van Dijk
- George KovalGKGeorge Koval
- Frederick W. SmithFSFrederick W. Smith
- 1 October 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 31 (5) , 305-308
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The advantages of the 30-cm flexible sigmoidoscope over the 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscopeGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1984
- Flexible sigmoidoscopy in primary carePostgraduate Medicine, 1982
- Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1982
- A new flexible sigmoidoscope for the generalistGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1982
- Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy? Half a loaf revisitedGastroenterology, 1981
- Superiority of the Flexible to the Rigid Sigmoidoscope in Routine ProctosigmoidoscopyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Comparison of flexible sigmoidoscopy with other diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of rectocolon neoplasiaDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1979
- Sigmoidoscopic examinations with rigid and flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopes in the surgeon's officeDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1979
- Flexible sigmoidoscopy: A potential advance in cancer controlGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1978
- Fiberoptic PansigmoidoscopyGastroenterology, 1977