Improving the quantification of Brownian motion
- 18 June 2013
- journal article
- Published by American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) in American Journal of Physics
- Vol. 81 (7) , 485-491
Abstract
Brownian motion experiments have become a staple of the undergraduate advanced laboratory, yet quantification of these experiments is difficult, typically producing errors of 10%–15% or more. Here, we discuss the individual sources of error in the experiment: sampling error, uncertainty in the diffusion coefficient, tracking error, vibration, and microscope drift. We model each source of error using theoretical and computational methods and compare the model to our experimental data. Finally, we describe various ways to reduce each source of error to less than 1%, improving the quantification of Brownian motion.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Einstein and the existence of atomsAmerican Journal of Physics, 2006
- Einstein, Perrin, and the reality of atoms: 1905 revisitedAmerican Journal of Physics, 2006
- Measuring Boltzmann’s constant using video microscopy of Brownian motionAmerican Journal of Physics, 2003
- Brownian motion using a laser pointerThe Physics Teacher, 1998
- Viewer for Brownian motionThe Physics Teacher, 1991
- Boltzmann’s constant: A laboratory experimentAmerican Journal of Physics, 1989
- Viewing Brownian motion with laser lightAmerican Journal of Physics, 1976
- A Brownian Motion Demonstration Using TelevisionAmerican Journal of Physics, 1973
- A Study of Brownian Motion Using Light ScatteringAmerican Journal of Physics, 1970
- Brownian Motion Determination of Avogadro's NumberAmerican Journal of Physics, 1965