Neighbors and Extension Agents in Ethiopia: Who Matters More for Technology Adoption?
Top Cited Papers
- 2 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Vol. 96 (1) , 308-327
Abstract
The increased adoption of fertilizer and improved seeds are two key aspects to raising the level of land productivity in Ethiopian agriculture. However, the adoption and diffusion of such technologies has been slow. We use data from Ethiopia between 1999–2009 to examine the role of learning from extension agents versus learning from neighbors for both improved seeds and fertilizer adoption. We combine farmers' spatial networks with panel data to identify these influences, and find that while the initial impact of extension agents was high, the effect wore off after some time, in contrast to learning from neighbors.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- International Growth Centre
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: Evidence from EthiopiaJournal of Development Economics, 2011
- Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from KenyaAmerican Economic Review, 2011
- The Impact of Agricultural Extension and Roads on Poverty and Consumption Growth in Fifteen Ethiopian VillagesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2009
- Identification of peer effects through social networksJournal of Econometrics, 2009
- Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern MozambiqueThe Economic Journal, 2006
- Assessing the Impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000Science, 2003
- The Effect of Agricultural Extension on Farm Yields in KenyaAfrican Development Review, 2001
- The Impact of T&V Extension in Africa: The Experience of Kenya and Burkina FasoThe World Bank Research Observer, 1997
- Measuring Peer Group Effects: A Study of Teenage BehaviorJournal of Political Economy, 1992
- Emerging Phenomenon: A Cycle in HogsJournal of Farm Economics, 1959