Comparison of a Computer Assisted Learning Program to Standard Education Tools in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Education, coaching and guidance of patients are important components of heart failure management. The aim of this study was to compare a computer assisted learning (CAL) program with standard education (brochures and oral information from nurses) on knowledge and self-care in hospitalized heart failure patients. Satisfaction with the CAL program was also assessed in the intervention group. A quasi-experimental design was used, with a convenience sample of in-hospital heart failure patients. Knowledge and self-care were measured using the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale and the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale at hospital admission, at discharge and after a 3-month follow-up. Satisfaction with the CAL program was assessed at hospital discharge using a satisfaction questionnaire. Within and between groups, changes in knowledge and self-care over time were tested using a mixed regression model. Of 65 heart failure patients screened, 37 were included in the study: 21 in the CAL group and 16 in the usual care group. No significant differences in knowledge (p=0.65) or self-care (p=0.40) could be found between groups. However, both variables improved significantly over time in each study group (p<0.0001). Both educational strategies increased knowledge and improved self-care. The design did not allow isolation of the effects of standard education usual care from CAL. Economic and clinical outcomes of both methods should be evaluated in further research.

This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit: