Diffusion imaging could aid to differentiate between glioma progression and treatment-related abnormalities: a meta-analysis
Authors:
Open Access
- 4 October 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Insights into Imaging
- Vol. 13 (1) , 1-12
Abstract
Background: In a considerable subgroup of glioma patients treated with (chemo) radiation new lesions develop either representing tumor progression (TP) or treatment-related abnormalities (TRA). Quantitative diffusion imaging metrics such as the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Fractional Anisotropy (FA) have been reported as potential metrics to noninvasively differentiate between these two phenomena. Variability in performance scores of these metrics and absence of a critical overview of the literature contribute to the lack of clinical implementation. This meta-analysis therefore critically reviewed the literature and meta-analyzed the performance scores. Methods: Systematic searching was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. Using predefined criteria, papers were reviewed. Diagnostic accuracy values of suitable papers were meta-analyzed quantitatively. Results: Of 1252 identified papers, 10 ADC papers, totaling 414 patients, and 4 FA papers, with 154 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. Mean ADC values of the patients in the TP/TRA groups were 1.13 × 10−3mm2/s (95% CI 0.912 × 10–3–1.32 × 10−3mm2/s) and 1.38 × 10−3mm2/s (95% CI 1.33 × 10–3–1.45 × 10−3mm2/s, respectively. Mean FA values of TP/TRA was 0.19 (95% CI 0.189–0.194) and 0.14 (95% CI 0.137–0.143) respectively. A significant mean difference between ADC and FA values in TP versus TRA was observed (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Quantitative ADC and FA values could be useful for distinguishing TP from TRA on a meta-level. Further studies using serial imaging of individual patients are warranted to determine the role of diffusion imaging in glioma patients.Keywords
Funding Information
- Interreg (203020/2020P18)
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differentiation between low-grade and high-grade glioma using combined diffusion tensor imaging metricsClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2013
- Infiltrative patterns of glioblastoma: Identification of tumor progress using apparent diffusion coefficient histogramsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2013
- Morphologic MRI features, diffusion tensor imaging and radiation dosimetric analysis to differentiate pseudo-progression from early tumor progressionJournal of Neuro-Oncology, 2013
- Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for the Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression Following Concomitant Radiotherapy with Temozolomide in Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-grade GliomasAcademic Radiology, 2012
- Multimodality Assessment of Brain Tumors and Tumor RecurrenceJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2011
- Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis Stratifies Progression-Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed Bevacizumab-Treated GlioblastomaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2011
- Distinction between postoperative recurrent glioma and radiation injury using MR diffusion tensor imagingNeuroradiology, 2010
- Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Distinction Between Recurrent Glioma and Radiation Injury Using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Combination With Diffusion-Weighted ImagingInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2007
- Advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques to evaluate CNS gliomaExpert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 2005