Synergies between centralized and federated approaches to data quality: a report from the national COVID cohort collaborative
Open Access
- 2 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 29 (4) , 609-618
Abstract
Objective: In response to COVID-19, the informatics community united to aggregate as much clinical data as possible to characterize this new disease and reduce its impact through collaborative analytics. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is now the largest publicly available HIPAA limited dataset in US history with over 6.4 million patients and is a testament to a partnership of over 100 organizations. Materials and Methods: We developed a pipeline for ingesting, harmonizing, and centralizing data from 56 contributing data partners using 4 federated Common Data Models. N3C data quality (DQ) review involves both automated and manual procedures. In the process, several DQ heuristics were discovered in our centralized context, both within the pipeline and during downstream project-based analysis. Feedback to the sites led to many local and centralized DQ improvements. Results: Beyond well-recognized DQ findings, we discovered 15 heuristics relating to source Common Data Model conformance, demographics, COVID tests, conditions, encounters, measurements, observations, coding completeness, and fitness for use. Of 56 sites, 37 sites (66%) demonstrated issues through these heuristics. These 37 sites demonstrated improvement after receiving feedback. Discussion: We encountered site-to-site differences in DQ which would have been challenging to discover using federated checks alone. We have demonstrated that centralized DQ benchmarking reveals unique opportunities for DQ improvement that will support improved research analytics locally and in aggregate. Conclusion: By combining rapid, continual assessment of DQ with a large volume of multisite data, it is possible to support more nuanced scientific questions with the scale and rigor that they require.Keywords
Funding Information
- NCATS (U24TR002306)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers.2015
- Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research networkJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2014
- How the Provenance of Electronic Health Record Data Matters for Research: A Case Example Using System MappingeGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes), 2014
- Defining and measuring completeness of electronic health records for secondary useJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2013
- Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical researchJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2013
- A Pragmatic Framework for Single-site and Multisite Data Quality Assessment in Electronic Health Record-based Clinical ResearchMedical Care, 2012
- Data Quality in Clinical Research2012
- Developing the Sentinel System — A National Resource for Evidence DevelopmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Advancing the Science for Active Surveillance: Rationale and Design for the Observational Medical Outcomes PartnershipAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Development and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databasesJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2010