Getting to the top: an analysis of 25 years of career rankings trajectories for professional women’s tennis
- 2 October 2016
- journal article
- performance analysis
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Sports Sciences
- Vol. 35 (19) , 1904-1910
Abstract
Official rankings are the most common measure of success in professional women’s tennis. Despite their importance for earning potential and tournament seeding, little is known about ranking trajectories of female players and their influence on career success. Our objective was to conduct a comprehensive study of the career progression of elite female tennis talent. The study examined the ranking trajectories of the top 250 female professionals between 1990 and 2015. Using regression modelling of yearly peak rankings, we found a strong association between the shape of the ranking trajectory and the highest career ranking earned. Players with the highest career peak ranking were the youngest when first ranked. For example, top 10 players were first ranked at age 15.5 years (99% CI = 14.8–15.9), 1.2 years (99% CI = 0.8–1.5) earlier than top 51–100 players. Top 10 players were also ranked in the top 100 longer than other players, holding a top 100 ranking until a mean age of 29.0 years (99% CI = 27.8–30.3) compared with age 24.4 years (99% CI = 23.7–25.2) for top 51–100 players. Ranking trajectories were more distinct with respect to player age than years from first ranking. The present study’s findings will be instructive for players, coaches, and administrators in setting goals and assessing athlete development in women’s tennis.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Confident Can We Be in Modelling Female Swimming Performance in Adolescence?Sports, 2016
- Grand Slams are Short-Changing Women's TennisSignificance, 2015
- An examination of the stakeholders and elite athlete development pathways in tennisEuropean Sport Management Quarterly, 2015
- Analysis of tennis champions’ career: how did top-ranked players perform the previous years?SpringerPlus, 2014
- An examination of the importance of performances in youth and junior competition as an indicator of later success in tennisSport Management Review, 2012
- Age Trends In Professional Tennis PlayersMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2009
- Tournament structure and nations' success in women's professional tennisJournal of Sports Sciences, 2007
- The Sony Ericsson WTA Tour 10 year age eligibility and professional development review * CommentaryBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2006
- Progression and variability of competitive performance of Olympic swimmersJournal of Sports Sciences, 2004
- Peak performance and age: An examination of peak performance in sports1990