Validation of the Bangla WHO-5 Well-being Index
Open Access
- 19 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health
- Vol. 8
Abstract
Background: Subjective wellbeing in terms of objective outcome can be useful to determine the level of progress in clinical practice as well as research studies in Bangladesh. Besides, cultural understanding of well-being for Bangladeshi population is also equally important to report. A valid Bangla version of the five-item WHO Well-being Index can be a suitable measure to achieve the purposes. Therefore, the present study aimed at validating the WHO-5 Well-being Index for general population in Bangladesh. Methods: After following the standard procedures for translation, back-translation, and committee translation, the initial Bangla version of the scale was developed and pretested. Based on the feedback during pretesting, a slight modification was made and the final version was developed. This final version was administered to 269 participants of different socioeconomic backgrounds to find out the reliability and validity of the scale from March 2019 to May 2019. The data analysis was conducted using SPSS 24. Results: The scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.754) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.713), divergent validity (r = −0.443, p < 0.01 with the Bangla version of Perceived Stress Scale-10) and convergent validity (r = 0.542, p < 0.01 with the Bangla version of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale). The data also yielded one-factor structure for the scale in exploratory factor analysis explaining 38.68% of total variance. The factor-structure was further supported in the confirmatory factor analysis (χ2 = 295.852, χ2/df = 2.017, RMSEA = 0.062, CFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.964, and SRMR = 0.0255). Conclusion: The findings suggested the Bangla version of the WHO-5 Well-being Index is a psychometrically valid and reliable tool for general adult population in Bangladeshi when it comes to measuring subjective well-being both in clinical practice and research studies.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychometric and screening properties of the WHO‐5 well‐being index in adult outpatients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitusDiabetic Medicine, 2013
- The challenge of defining wellbeingInternational Journal of Wellbeing, 2012
- Making sense of Cronbach's alphaInternational Journal of Medical Education, 2011
- Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerationsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2010
- The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validationHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2007
- Perceived e‐service quality (PeSQ)Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 2007
- Non-Probability Sampling2005
- When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application.Psychological Bulletin, 2003
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983