Hypothetical bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it?
Authors:
- Simon FiferSFSimon Fifer
- John RoseJRJohn Rose
- Stephen GreavesSGStephen Greaves
- 1 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
- Vol. 61, 164-177
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Combined GPS/Stated Choice Experiment to Estimate Values of Crash-Risk ReductionJournal of Choice Modelling, 2011
- Development of a Global Positioning System Web-Based Prompted Recall Solution for Longitudinal Travel SurveysTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010
- Development of a Kilometer-Based Rewards System to Encourage Safer Driving PracticesTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010
- Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental DesignsTransport Reviews, 2009
- Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation StudiesEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2009
- Incentive and informational properties of preference questionsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2007
- Anomalies and Stated Preference Techniques: A Framework for a Discussion of Coping StrategiesEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2005
- A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference ValuationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2005
- Behavioral Responses to Road Pricing Schemes: Description of the Danish AKTA ExperimentJournal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2004
- Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef SteaksAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2004