Natriuretic peptide responses to exercise in HFpEF diagnosis: a pilot study
Open Access
- 1 July 2026
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Open Heart
- Vol. 13 (2) , e004313
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can be challenging because natriuretic peptide (NP) plasma levels and diastolic function parameters during rest echocardiography may be normal or marginally abnormal in patients displaying exercise-induced symptoms suggestive of HF. In these patients exercise echocardiography is recommended. We wanted to assess whether directly measured NP levels post-exercise had added diagnostic value beyond rest plasma N-terminal pro-brain NP (NT-proBNP) levels for diagnosing HFpEF. Methods: Participants with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), who could not be classified as HFpEF by a panel of experts more than 4 years ago, were prospectively enrolled in the HELPFulUP observational study from August 2021 to October 2022. All participants in the HELPFulUP study underwent clinical assessment, rest and exercise-echocardiography and measurements of plasma NT-proBNP before and directly after exercise. An expert panel, blinded to exercise NT-proBNP results, but with knowledge of signs, symptoms and all other diagnostic parameters including baseline values of NT-proBNP adjudicated HFpEF status. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the curve (AUC)) for HFpEF for rest and post-exercise NT-proBNP levels and the delta NT-proBNP. Results: Of the 112 LVDD participants (59 women), 11 were diagnosed with HFpEF by the expert panel based on the additional information retrieved from exercise echocardiography, and 101 remained classified as LVDD. Rest (AUC=0.78 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.90) and exercise values of NT-proBNP (AUC=0.77 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.90) had similar discriminatory value. The delta NT-proBNP AUC was 0.53 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.75). Conclusions: In this pilot study, the diagnostic performance of the change with exercise in NP levels to detect incident HFpEF, beyond measurements in rest, did not point to a strong diagnostic value.Keywords
Funding Information
- Dutch Cardiovascular Alliance (2020B008 RECONNEXT)
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: everything the clinician needs to knowThe Lancet, 2024
- Exercise-Induced B-Lines in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Occur Along with Diastolic Function WorseningESC Heart Failure, 2021
- 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failureEuropean Heart Journal, 2021
- How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)European Heart Journal, 2019
- Diastolic Stress Test Echocardiography in Patients with Suspected Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Pilot StudyESC Heart Failure, 2018
- Exercise Elicits Dynamic Changes in Extravascular Lung Water and Haemodynamic Congestion in Heart Failure Patients with Preserved Ejection FractionEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2018
- Biomarkers in heart failure with preserved ejection fractionNetherlands Heart Journal, 2016
- Changes in BNP and cardiac troponin I after high-intensity interval and endurance exercise in heart failure patients and healthy controlsInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2015
- Exercise-Induced Biphasic Increase in Circulating NT-proBNP Levels in Patients with Chronic Heart FailureEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2008
- NT-ProBNP: The Mechanism Behind the MarkerJournal of Cardiac Failure, 2005