ECONOMIC AND OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS OF MECHANIZED FOREST IMPLEMENTATION
Authors:
- Nilton Cesar FiedlerNFNilton Cesar Fiedler
- Alexandre Arantes de CamposACAlexandre Arantes de Campos
- Marcos Vinicius Winckler CaldeiraMarcos Vinicius Winckler Caldeira
- Julião Soares de Souza LimaJLJulião Soares de Souza Lima
- Antônio Henrique Cordeiro RamalhoARAntônio Henrique Cordeiro Ramalho
- Eduardo da Silva LopesELEduardo da Silva Lopes
Open Access
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Revista Árvore
- Vol. 44
Abstract
Mechanization in forestry implantation demands high energy, time, and high operational and production costs. Thus, studies related to the influence of variables on the efficiency of these activities are essential to reduce costs and optimize operations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the operational and cost performance of mechanized forest implantation operations in Eucalyptus sp. Data were collected from eucalyptus plantations located in the northern region of the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. The analysis of operational performance determined the distribution of operating times, mechanical availability, degree of utilization, operational efficiency, and productivity of the machines. The cost analysis estimated the operating costs in forestry implantation activities. The forest planting operations were: waste removal, subsoiling, digging with fertilization, planting, chemical weeding, and covering fertilization. According to the results, planting (39.20%) and waste removal (15.99%) represented the longest operating cycle times, the shortest production times (51.48% and 53.64%), and finally the longest maintenance times (32.95% and 29%). Chemical weeding and subsoiling showed the lowest maintenance times (4.64% and 3.47%). The cover fertilization was the operation that presented the highest productivity (2.99 ha he-1), and the removal of residues had the lowest (0.97 ha he-1). The highest costs per effective hour (R$13.57 he-1) and lowest production costs (R$81.59 ha-1) occurred at planting. Subsoiling had the highest production cost (R$112.80 ha-1). The lowest operating cost was obtained in the fertilizing operation. Operating costs had the greatest weight in labor, fuel, and maintenance and repairs.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- AVALIAÇÃO DO DESEMPENHO E CUSTOS DE DOIS SISTEMAS DE CABOS AÉREOS NA EXTRAÇÃO DE MADEIRA DE EUCALIPTOCiência Florestal, 2017
- ANÁLISE TÉCNICA E DE CUSTO DO FELLER BUNCHER E SKIDDER NA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DIFERENTES PRODUTIVIDADES DO POVOAMENTOCiência Florestal, 2015
- PRODUTIVIDADE E CUSTOS DO FELLER-BUNCHER E PROCESSADOR FLORESTAL EM POVOAMENTO DE EUCALIPTO DE PRIMEIRO CORTECiência Florestal, 2014
- AVALIAÇÃO DE CUSTOS DE DOIS MODELOS DE HARVESTER NO CORTE DE EUCALIPTOCiência Florestal, 2014
- Köppen's climate classification map for BrazilMeteorologische Zeitschrift, 2013
- AVALIAÇÃO TÉCNICA E ECONÔMICA DO HARVESTER EM DIFERENTES CONDIÇÕES OPERACIONAISREVISTA ENGENHARIA NA AGRICULTURA - REVENG, 2012
- Análise de custos da implantação de cultivos de eucalipto em áreas acidentadas no sul do Espírito SantoCERNE, 2011
- ANÁLISE DA PRODUTIVIDADE DE UM SISTEMA DE COLHEITA DE ÁRVORES INTEIRAS NO NORTE DO ESTADO DE GOIÁSFLORESTA, 2008
- Análise técnica e econômica da colheita florestal mecanizada em Niquelândia, GoiásRevista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola E Ambiental, 2008
- Custos e rendimentos operacionais de um plantio de eucalipto em região de cerradoRevista Árvore, 2004