To Improve Motivational Barriers to Retention in High Resolution Anoscopy, Patients and Providers Recommend Social and Environmental Changes: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Pilot Study in a Federally Qualified Health Center
Authors:
Open Access
- 12 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in AIDS and Behavior
- Vol. 28 (10) , 3449-3464
Abstract
Loss to follow-up (LTFU) in high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) programs jeopardizes the procedure’s potential to help prevent anal cancer. We explored quality improvement factors to understand how to address this LTFU. Using the transtheoretical COM-B Model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior) and a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, we surveyed and interviewed 13 patients who remained engaged in HIV care but who delayed their HRA monitoring or treatment visits in the same community clinic, and 6 HRA clinicians and medical assistants. Analyses involved descriptive statistics and rapid qualitative analysis. Patients were racially, ethnically, and economically representative of the LTFU population, and were generally experienced with HRA (Mean HRA visits = 4.6, SD = 2.8, mdn = 3). Providers were experienced clinicians and medical assistants (Mean years providing HRA = 6.0, SD = 2.2). Analyses revealed two primary, related barriers: (A) motivational barriers such as physical pain, discomfort, embarrassment, and anxiety; which were largely borne from (B) opportunity barriers such as difficulties with scheduling, inconsistent after-care (particularly for pain and discomfort), anxiety-inducing exam rooms and equipment, and internalized and anticipated stigma. Capability barriers, such as limited health literacy about HRA, were less common and, like motivational barriers, linked to opportunity barriers. Participants recommended potential facilitators, including easier scheduling, standardization of pain management and after-care services, and examination room modifications to reduce anxiety. To retain HRA patients in community settings, interventions should address social and physical opportunity barriers that strongly determine motivational and capability barriers. Improving convenience, standardizing pain management, and introducing stigma interventions specific to HRA, could alleviate both motivational and capability barriers.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH124569, K01MH115785, P30MH043520)
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University (Gray Matters Fellowship, Gray Matters Fellowship)
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Application of the COM-B model to barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: a systematic reviewImplementation Science, 2018
- Factors associated with anal cancer screening follow-up by high-resolution anoscopySexually Transmitted Infections, 2018
- Facilitators of and barriers to high-resolution anoscopy adherence among men who have sex with men: a qualitative studySexual Health, 2018
- Medication adherence outcomes of 771 intervention trials: Systematic review and meta-analysisPreventive Medicine, 2017
- Pain Management for Gynecologic Procedures in the OfficeObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2016
- Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients and carers regarding medication adherence: a review of qualitative literatureEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2014
- The Impact of Gentle Language on Pain Perception During ColposcopyJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 2014
- The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventionsImplementation Science, 2011
- Addressing Anal Health in the HIV Primary Care Setting: A Disappointing RealityAIDS Patient Care and STDs, 2010
- Anal Cancer Screening: Barriers and Facilitators Among Ethnically Diverse Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Other Men Who Have Sex With MenJournal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 2008