Spectral landscapes show that responses to land-use change by aerial insectivorous bats are guild and scale dependent
Authors:
- Sergio Estrada-VillegasSergio Estrada-Villegas
- Angélica V. YanténAngélica V. Yantén
- Ana María Ávila-GarcíaAÁAna María Ávila-García
- Geraldine Buitrago-CastañoGBGeraldine Buitrago-Castaño
- Manuel J. Castañeda LópezMLManuel J. Castañeda López
- Orlando Fabián Hernández LealOrlando Fabián Hernández Leal
- Sergio SolariSergio Solari
- Leidy Laura López-SepúlvedaLeidy Laura López-Sepúlveda
- Carlos Ortiz-YustyCarlos Ortiz-Yusty
- Jefferson Sánchez-CastrillónJefferson Sánchez-Castrillón
- Diana Cardona RamírezDRDiana Cardona Ramírez
- Jon FlandersJon Flanders
Open Access
- 12 August 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Biodiversity and Conservation
- Vol. 35 (10) , 239
Abstract
A central quest in conservation biology is to understand how wildlife responds to human-modified landscapes. Yet assessing features of transformed landscapes is non-trivial because categorical maps obscure ecologically meaningful transitions that organisms perceive continuously. We overcame this limitation by using satellite-based fine-scale continuous measures of landscape structure to examine how the cover, complexity, distribution and isolation of exposed and forested areas influence the composition of two guild of aerial insectivorous bats across multiple spatial scales. Although insectivorous bats provide key ecosystem services, it is still unclear which landscape features favor or reduce their abundance, and at what scales these effects occur. Our study was conducted in a heterogeneous agricultural mosaic in the central Andes of Colombia, ranging from well-preserved forests to open-pit mines. Bats that forage within forests or along edges were more abundant at sites with more forest cover but also where vegetation was more complex in terms of roughness and the presence of edges across all spatial scales. Contrary to our predictions, bats that forage in open spaces decreased in areas where exposed lands and fragments were dispersed and isolated at small spatial scales. At large spatial scales, open-space bats required abundant forest cover. These results show that insectivorous bats respond differently to landscape change depending on their ecology and movement behavior, and that these responses vary with spatial scale. Our findings highlight the value of using continuous landscape measures to better understand, manage, and conserve insectivorous bats in regions undergoing rapid land-use change.Keywords
Funding Information
- Universidad del Rosario
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biodiversity Credits: An Overview of the Current State, Future Opportunities, and Potential PitfallsBusiness Strategy and the Environment, 2025
- Gradients and the Structure of Neotropical Metacommunities: Effects of Disturbance, Elevation, Landscape Structure, and Biogeography2023
- Landscape structure shapes activity levels and composition of aerial insectivorous bats at different spatial scalesBiodiversity and Conservation, 2021
- Building a socio‐ecological monitoring platform for the comprehensive management of tropical dry forestsPlants, People, Planet, 2020
- Gradient Analysis and Surface Metrics for Landscape Ecology2019
- Surface metrics for landscape ecology: a comparison of landscape models across ecoregions and scalesLandscape Ecology, 2018
- Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitatOecologia, 2012
- Surface metrics: an alternative to patch metrics for the quantification of landscape structureLandscape Ecology, 2009
- Echolocation and foraging behavior of the lesser bulldog bat, Noctilio albiventris : preadaptations for piscivory?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1998
- Echolocation, development, and vocal communication in the lesser bulldog bat, Noctilio albiventrisBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1983