Diagnosing phosphorus limitations in natural terrestrial ecosystems in carbon cycle models
Authors:
- Yan SunYSYan Sun
- Shushi PengSPShushi Peng
- Daniel S. GollDGDaniel S. Goll
- Bertrand GuenetBGBertrand Guenet
- Matthieu GuimberteauMGMatthieu Guimberteau
- Philippe HinsingerPHPhilippe Hinsinger
- Ivan A. JanssensIJIvan A. Janssens
- Josep PeñuelasJosep Peñuelas
- Shilong PiaoSPShilong Piao
- Benjamin PoulterBenjamin Poulter
Open Access
- 18 July 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Earth's Future
- Vol. 5 (7) , 730-749
Abstract
Most of the Earth System Models (ESMs) project increases in net primary productivity (NPP) and terrestrial carbon (C) storage during the 21st century. Despite empirical evidence that limited availability of phosphorus (P) may limit the response of NPP to increasing atmospheric CO2, none of the ESMs used in the previous Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment accounted for P limitation. We diagnosed from ESM simulations the amount of P need to support increases in carbon uptake by natural ecosystems using two approaches: the demand derived from (1) changes in C stocks and (2) changes in NPP. The C stock‐based additional P demand was estimated to range between −31 and 193 Tg P and between −89 and 262 Tg P for Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 2.6 and RCP8.5, respectively, with negative values indicating a P surplus. The NPP‐based demand, which takes ecosystem P recycling into account, results in a significantly higher P demand of 648–1606 Tg P for RCP2.6 and 924–2110 Tg P for RCP8.5. We found that the P demand is sensitive to the turnover of P in decomposing plant material, explaining the large differences between the NPP‐based demand and C stock‐based demand. The discrepancy between diagnosed P demand and actual P availability (potential P deficit) depends mainly on the assumptions about availability of the different soil P forms. Overall, future P limitation strongly depends on both soil P availability and P recycling on ecosystem scale.Keywords
Funding Information
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Office of Science
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a reviewAnnals of Botany, 2012
- Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scalesNew Phytologist, 2012
- Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta‐analyses of interspecific variation and environmental controlNew Phytologist, 2011
- TRY – a global database of plant traitsGlobal Change Biology, 2011
- Phosphorus Nutrition of Proteaceae in Severely Phosphorus-Impoverished Soils: Are There Lessons To Be Learned for Future Crops?Plant Physiology, 2011
- Global meta‐analysis of wood decomposition rates: a role for trait variation among tree species?Ecology Letters, 2008
- Phosphorus management in low input stockless cropping systems: Crop and soil responses to contrasting P regimes in a 36-year experiment in southern FranceEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 2007
- The worldwide leaf economics spectrumNature, 2004
- A literature review and evaluation of the. Hedley fractionation: Applications to the biogeochemical cycle of soil phosphorus in natural ecosystemsGeoderma, 1995
- The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesisGeoderma, 1976