Comparative Study of Sensitivity, Linearity, and Resistance to Inhibition of Digital and Nondigital Polymerase Chain Reaction and Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for Quantification of Human Cytomegalovirus
- 31 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Analytical Chemistry
- Vol. 86 (9) , 4387-4394
Abstract
Performing nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAATs) in digital format using limiting dilution provides potential advantages that have recently been demonstrated with digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR). Key benefits that have been claimed are the ability to quantify nucleic acids without the need of an external calibrator and a greater resistance to inhibitors than real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). In this study, we evaluated the performance of four NAATs, qPCR, dPCR, real-time quantitative loop mediated isothermal amplification (qLAMP), and digital LAMP (dLAMP), for the detection and quantification of human cytomegalovirus (hCMV). We used various DNA templates and inhibitors to compare the performance of these methods using a conventional real-time thermocycler platform (Bio-Rad CFX96) and a chip based digital platform (Fluidigm Biomark 12.765 Digital Array). dPCR performed well and demonstrated greater resistance to inhibitors than the other methods although this resistance did not apply equally to all inhibitors tested. dLAMP was found to be less sensitive than dPCR, but its quantitative performance was better than qLAMP, the latter being unable to quantify below 1000 copies. dLAMP was also more resistant to inhibitors than qLAMP. Unlike qPCR, both digital methods were able to quantify viral genomes without requiring a calibrator; however, neither can currently compete with the large reaction volumes, and thus the greater absolute sensitivity, of qPCR. With the introduction of digital instrumentation that will enable larger reaction volumes, digital amplification methods such as those evaluated in this study could potentially offer a robust alternative to qPCR for nucleic acid quantification.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA QuantificationPLOS ONE, 2013
- The Digital MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR ExperimentsClinical Chemistry, 2013
- Methods for Applying Accurate Digital PCR Analysis on Low Copy DNA SamplesPLOS ONE, 2013
- Mechanistic Evaluation of the Pros and Cons of Digital RT-LAMP for HIV-1 Viral Load Quantification on a Microfluidic Device and Improved Efficiency via a Two-Step Digital ProtocolAnalytical Chemistry, 2013
- Digital LAMP in a sample self-digitization (SD) chipLab on a Chip, 2012
- Digital Isothermal Quantification of Nucleic Acids via Simultaneous Chemical Initiation of Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Reactions on SlipChipAnalytical Chemistry, 2011
- The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR ExperimentsClinical Chemistry, 2009
- Digital PCR provides sensitive and absolute calibration for high throughput sequencingBMC Genomics, 2009
- Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenonBMC Research Notes, 2008
- Real-Time PCR Assays for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Quantitation Are Adequate for Clinical Management of Patients with Chronic HCV InfectionJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006