Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon
Authors:
- Damien GarciaDGDamien Garcia
- Jean G DumesnilJDJean G Dumesnil
- Louis-Gilles DurandLDLouis-Gilles Durand
- Lyes KademLKLyes Kadem
- Philippe PibarotPPPhilippe Pibarot
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the Valve Area Underestimation by the Continuity EquationCardiology, 1992
- Theoretical and practical differences between the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation for calculating aortic and mitral valve areasThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Doppler echocardiographic quantitation of cross-sectional area under various hemodynamic conditions: An experimental validation in a canine model of supravalvular aortic stenosisJACC, 1990
- Perspective on valvular heart disease: An updateJACC, 1989
- Factors affecting doppler echocardiographic valve area assessment in aortic stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: Prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patientsJACC, 1988
- Echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in elderly patients with aortic stenosis and of changes in valve area after percutaneous balloon valvuloplastyJACC, 1987
- Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography.Circulation, 1985
- Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula.Circulation, 1985
- Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. IAmerican Heart Journal, 1951