Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 28 (5) , 1322-1328
Abstract
Objective: To assess survival in cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with respect to the nature of malignancy, cause of ICU admittance, and course during ICU stay as well as to evaluate the prognostic value of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: ICU at a university cancer referral center. Patients: A total of 414 cancer patients admitted to the ICU during a period of 66 months. Interventions: None. Measurements: Charts of the patients were analyzed with respect to underlying disease, cause of admission, APACHE III score, need and duration of mechanical ventilation, neutropenia and development of septic shock, as well as ICU survival and survival after discharge. Mortality data were compared with two control groups: 1362 patients admitted to our ICU suffering from diseases other than cancer and 2,776 cancer patients not admitted to the ICU. Main Results: ICU survival was 53%, and 1-yr survival was 23%. The 1-yr mortality rate was significantly lower in both control groups. Patients admitted after bone marrow transplantation had the highest mortality. In a multivariate analysis, prognosis was negatively influenced by respiratory insufficiency, the need of mechanical ventilation, and development of septic shock during the ICU stay. Admission after cardiopulmonary resuscitation yielded high ICU mortality but a relatively good long-term prognosis. Admission after surgery and as a result of acute hemorrhage was associated with a good prognosis. Age, neutropenia, and underlying disease did not influence outcome significantly. Admission APACHE III scores were significantly higher in nonsurvivors but failed to predict individual outcome satisfactorily. All patients with APACHE III scores of >80 died at the ICU. Conclusion: A combination of factors must be taken into account to estimate a critically ill cancer patient's prognosis in the ICU. The APACHE III scoring system alone should not be used to make decisions about therapy prolongation. Admission to the ICU worsens the prognosis of a cancer patient substantially; however, as ICU mortality is 47%, comparable with severely ill noncancer patients, general reluctance to admit cancer patients to an ICU does not seem to be justified.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The purpose and use of prognostic indices in critical care medicineCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 1996
- The prognosis of oncologic patients in the pediatric intensive care unitIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- Outcome of Patients Requiring Medical ICU Admission Following Bone Marrow TransplantationChest, 1993
- The APACHE III Prognostic SystemChest, 1991
- Long term prognosis and quality of life following intensive care for life-threatening complications of haematological malignancyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1991
- Outcome of oncology patients in the pediatric intensive care unitIntensive Care Medicine, 1991
- Age and utilization of intensive care unit resources of critically ill cancer patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1990
- Is intensive care justified for patients with haematological malignancies?Intensive Care Medicine, 1990
- Sepsis syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 1989
- Intensive therapy for life-threatening medical complications of haematological malignancyIntensive Care Medicine, 1986