Strategic management of business model transformation: lessons from Nokia
Authors:
- 3 May 2011
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Management Decision
- Vol. 49 (4) , 622-647
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to offer a conceptualization of how and why corporate level strategic change may build on historical differentiation at business unit level. Design/methodology/approach – Methodologically, an historical case study of Nokia Corporation's drastic business model transformation between the years 1987 and 1995 is reported. Findings – The conceptual and historical work results in a process model of business model change, demonstrating how central business units feed strategic alternatives and capabilities to the corporate-level transformation process. Practical implications – The results highlight the importance of corporate level “market mechanisms' that allow promising strategic alternatives to emerge and select out inferior options. In this process, a key mechanism is the exchange of executives and cognitive mindsets between business units and corporate headquarters (CHQ). Originality/value – The reported research offers an original contribution by showing the dynamic interplay of cognitive and organizational change processes, and highlighting the importance of building on existing capabilities and competencies despite the pressure to demonstrate strong turnaround activities.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competitive dynamics, strategic consistency, and organizational survivalStrategic Management Journal, 2008
- Small worlds evolving: governance reforms, privatizations, and ownership networks in ItalyIndustrial and Corporate Change, 2006
- The architecture and design of organizational capabilitiesIndustrial and Corporate Change, 2006
- The role of top management teams in formulating and implementing turnaround strategies: a review and research agendaInternational Journal of Management Reviews, 2004
- Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-inAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2002
- Are you sure you have a strategy?Academy of Management Perspectives, 2001
- ‘Effective governance’ through complexity thinking and management scienceSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 2001
- Organizational Decline and Innovation: A Contingency FrameworkAcademy of Management Review, 1998
- Competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry: Toward A Theoretical IntegrationAcademy of Management Review, 1996
- Asset sales and increase in focusJournal of Financial Economics, 1995