Trends in Reporting Gleason Score 1991 to 2001: Changes in the Pathologist's Practice
Authors:
- Ken GrigorKGKen Grigor
- David N. TullochDTDavid N. Tulloch
- Prasad R. BollinaPBPrasad R. Bollina
- S. Alan McNeillSMS. Alan McNeill
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in European Urology
- Vol. 47 (2) , 196-201
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time Trends in Clinical Risk Stratification for Prostate Cancer: Implications for Outcomes (Data From CaPSURE)Journal of Urology, 2003
- Prostate Cancer Grade Assignment: The Effect of Chronological, Interpretive and Translation BiasJournal of Urology, 2003
- Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 yearsCancer, 2002
- TRENDS IN GLEASON SCORE FOR PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSED BETWEEN 1983 AND 1993Journal of Urology, 2001
- Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: General pathologistHuman Pathology, 2001
- Rising incidence of prostate cancer in Scotland: increased risk or increased detection?BJU International, 2000
- Discrepancy between Gleason Scores of Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensEuropean Urology, 2000
- Population-based prostate cancer trends in the United States: patterns of change in the era of prostate-specific antigenWorld Journal of Urology, 1997
- Rise in prostatic Cancer Incidence Associated With Increased Use of Transurethral ResectionJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990
- Zonal Distribution of Prostatic AdenocarcinomaAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1988