Mortality and Morbidity after Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction: Predictive Factors
Authors:
- Alain SauvanetASAlain Sauvanet
- Christophe MarietteCMChristophe Mariette
- Pascal ThomasPTPascal Thomas
- Patrick Lozac'HPLPatrick Lozac'H
- Philippe SegolPSPhilippe Segol
- Emmanuel TiretETEmmanuel Tiret
- Jean-Robert DelperoJDJean-Robert Delpero
- Denis ColletDCDenis Collet
- Joël LeborgneJLJoël Leborgne
- Bernard PradèreBPBernard Pradère
- André BourgeonABAndré Bourgeon
- Jean-Pierre TribouletJTJean-Pierre Triboulet
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 201 (2) , 253-262
Abstract
Resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AGEJ) is associated with severe mortality and morbidity. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate mortality and morbidity after resection for AGEJ and to determine their predictive factors. Data from 1,192 patients (mean age 65 +/- 11 years) who underwent resection for AGEJ by members of French Association of Surgery from 1985 to 2000 were collected. A stepwise logistic regression model was built to identify by multivariate analysis the variables independently associated with mortality, morbidity, anastomotic leakage, and major pulmonary complications. Distribution of Siewert's type was: I = 480 (40%), II = 500 (42%), and III = 212 (18%). Most type I and II tumors were treated by esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy (93% and 58%, respectively), using an approach including a thoracotomy (82% and 64%, respectively); type III tumors were treated mainly by total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy (83%), through an exclusive transabdominal approach (69%). Seventy-six (6%) patients died postoperatively. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores III and IV (p < 0.001) and period of study (p = 0.025) were predictive of mortality. Predictive factors of overall morbidity (overall rate = 35%) were high ASA score (p < 0.001), age more than 60 years (p = 0.020), male gender (p = 0.039), and cervical anastomosis (p = 0.001). Factors predictive of anastomotic leakage (overall rate = 9%) were high ASA score (p = 0.006) and manual anastomosis (p = 0.010). Factors predictive of major pulmonary complications (overall rate = 23%) were high ASA score (p = 0.015), age more than 60 years (p < 0.001), anastomotic leakage (p < 0.001), and abdominal complications (p = 0.003). ASA score is a reliable predictive factor of operative mortality and morbidity after resection of AGEJ.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinomaJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2004
- Cervical or Thoracic Anastomosis After Esophageal Resection and Gastric Tube ReconstructionAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort studyBMJ, 2003
- Evaluation of POSSUM in patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing resectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Preoperative risk analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagusBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancerThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2000
- Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after oesophagectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: A controlled trialSurgery, 1996
- Surgical Strategies in Esophageal Carcinoma With Emphasis on Radical LymphadenectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1992