Quality of care in public sector family planning services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a qualitative evaluation from community and health care provider perspectives
Authors:
Open Access
- 18 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-16
Abstract
Background: Quality of care is a multidimensional concept that forms an integral part of the uptake and use of modern contraceptive methods. Satisfaction with services is a significant factor in the continued use of services. While much is known about quality of care in the general public health care service, little is known about family planning specific quality of care in South Africa. This paper aims to fill the gap in the research by using the Bruce-Jain family planning quality of care framework. Methods: This formative qualitative study was conducted in South Africa, Zambia, and Kenya to explore the uptake of family planning and contraception. The results presented in this paper are from the South African data. Fourteen focus group discussions, twelve with community members and two with health care providers, were conducted along with eight in-depth interviews with key informants. Thematic content analysis using the Bruce-Jain Quality of Care framework was conducted to analyse this data using NVIVO 10. Results: Family planning quality of care was defined by participants as the quality of contraceptive methods, attitudes of health care providers, and outcomes of contraceptive use. The data showed that women have limited autonomy in their choice to either use contraception or the method that they might prefer. Important elements that relate to quality of care were identified and described by participants and grouped according to the structural or process components of the framework. Structure-related sub-themes identified included the lack of technically trained providers; integration of services that contributed to long waiting times and mixing of a variety of clients; and poor infrastructure. Sub-themes raised under the process category included poor interpersonal relations; lack of counselling/information exchange, fear; and time constraints. Neither providers nor users discussed follow up mechanisms which is a key aspect to ensure continuity of contraceptive use. Conclusion: Using a qualitative methodology and applying the Bruce-Jain Quality of Care framework provided key insights into perceptions and challenges about family planning quality of care. Identifying which components are specific to family planning is important for improving contraceptive outcomes. In particular, autonomy in user choice of contraceptive method, integration of services, and the acceptability of overall family planning care was raised as areas of concern.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integrating HIV care into nurse-led primary health care services in South Africa: a synthesis of three linked qualitative studiesBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Official statistics and claims data records indicate non-response and recall bias within survey-based estimates of health care utilization in the older populationBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- High Incidence of Unplanned Pregnancy after Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation: Findings from a Prospective Cohort Study in South AfricaPLOS ONE, 2012
- Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and GhanaBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Timeliness of Contraceptive Reinjections in South Africa And Its Relation to Unintentional DiscontinuationInternational Family Planning Perspectives, 2007
- Blood Blockages and Scolding Nurses: Barriers to Adolescent Contraceptive Use in South AfricaReproductive Health Matters, 2006
- Mothers, daughters and sexual agency in one low-income South African communitySocial Science & Medicine, 2005
- Integration of sexual and reproductive health services in KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaHealth Policy and Planning, 2005
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988
- The quality of care. How can it be assessed?JAMA, 1988