Effects of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics on Human Labour: A Systematic Review
- 30 October 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Edinburgh University Press in Legal Information Management
- Vol. 24 (2) , 109-124
Abstract
This systematic literature review paper, written by Channarong Intahchomphoo , Jason Millar , Odd Erik Gundersen , Christian Tschirhart , Kris Meawasige and Hojjat Salemi , examines academic research publications to learn about the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics on human labour. Papers were collected from three academic databases: Scopus, Web of Science and ABI/INFORM Collection. From 710 papers, 159 papers were included. The article finds that the effects of AI and robotics on human labour can be categorised as: (i) positive effects, (ii) negative effects, and (iii) neutral or unsure effects. The positive effects have five reasons regarding AI and robotics’ potential to: do dangerous work, do tedious work with high efficiency and accuracy, do some aspects of computing work, do work that human labour does not want to do and be used to deal with the labour shortage, and help to reduce business production and maintenance costs. The negative effects are based on two reasons, that AI and robotics will take over human labour in part or entirely, thereby creating unemployment crises, and will not only replace manually repetitive jobs from human labour but also cognitive jobs, causing human labour to fear that their jobs will be replaced by AI and robotics. The neutral and unsure effects are based on various unique arguments. The findings of this review are used to suggest future research for academic communities and practical recommendations to legal professionals and policy makers.Keywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- Field surface roughness levelling of the lapping metal surface using specular white lightThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022
- On machine learning and the replacement of human labour: anti-Cartesianism versus Babbage’s pathAI & SOCIETY, 2021
- Ball bonding inspections using a conjoint framework with machine learning and human judgementApplied Soft Computing, 2021
- The best task allocation process is to decide on one’s own: effects of the allocation agent in human–robot interaction on perceived work characteristics and satisfactionCognition, Technology & Work, 2020
- Automation and robotics in the cultivation of pome fruit: Where do we stand today?Journal of Field Robotics, 2020
- Preference for Human (vs. Robotic) Labor is Stronger in Symbolic Consumption ContextsJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2020
- Surfing the Waves of Digital Automation in Spanish Labor Market2019
- A Deep Learning Approach for Road Damage Classification2018
- Development of a high-endurance cleaning robot with scanning-based path planning and path correctionMicrosystem Technologies, 2018
- Differential evolution algorithm for solving RALB problem using cost- and time-based modelsThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016