Bridging the gap: optimizing conduction system pacing for cost-effectiveness and widespread adoption in low-resource settings
Open Access
- 1 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Asian Biomedicine
- Vol. 20 (3) , 155-160
Abstract
Background: Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing often leads to interventricular dyssynchrony and pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Conduction system pacing (CSP), particularly Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, provides a physiologic alternative. In Limited Resource Countries (LRCs) like Thailand, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) under-penetration persists due to high costs and a shortage of operators skilled in coronary venous anatomy. Objective: To share the experience and provide clinical update of CSP as a sustainable, cost-effective physiological pacing strategy to improve access to advanced arrhythmia management in resource-constrained environments. Methods: This review explores the implementation of minimalist protocols and CSP-based CRT. Scalability strategies include specialized training programs, device reprocessing, and the establishment of regional longitudinal registries to bridge infrastructure gaps. Results: CSP-based CRT can reduce device costs by nearly 50% compared with traditional triple-lead systems. This modality effectively mitigates the hemodynamic risks of RVA pacing while bypassing the technical and financial barriers of conventional CRT. Discussion: Despite its advantages, CSP adoption requires overcoming infrastructure challenges, specifically the lack of automated remote monitoring. Optimizing clinical outcomes in LRCs necessitates standardized training, robust data collection, and innovative resource management to ensure equitable access to life-saving technology.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bachmann bundle pacingHeart Rhythm, 2024
- His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy vs Biventricular PacingJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2023
- Comparative cost analysis of implanting devices in different cardiac resynchronization therapeutic strategiesClinical Cardiology, 2023
- Conduction system pacing, a European survey: insights from clinical practiceEP Europace, 2023
- Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyJACC, 2022
- The ‘10 commandments’ for the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapyEuropean Heart Journal, 2021
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: tough road but clear futureHeart Failure Reviews, 2020
- His Corrective Pacing or Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart FailureJACC, 2019
- Cleaning and Sterilization of Used Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Process ValidationJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2017
- His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: A crossover design comparisonHeart Rhythm, 2015