Prospective evaluation of the multisensor HeartLogic algorithm for heart failure monitoring
Open Access
- 18 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Cardiology
- Vol. 43 (7) , 691-697
Abstract
Background: The HeartLogic algorithm measures data from multiple implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator‐based sensors and combines them into a single index. The associated alert has proved to be a sensitive and timely predictor of impending heart failure (HF) decompensation.Hypothesis: We describe a multicenter experience of remote HF management by means of HeartLogic and appraise the value of an alert‐based follow‐up strategy.Methods: The alert was activated in 104 patients. All patients were followed up according to a standardized protocol that included remote data reviews and patient phone contacts every month and at the time of alerts. In‐office examinations were performed every 6 months or when deemed necessary.Results: During a median follow‐up of 13 (10–16) months, the overall number of HF hospitalizations was 16 (rate 0.15 hospitalizations/patient‐year) and 100 alerts were reported in 53 patients. Sixty alerts were judged clinically meaningful, and were associated with multiple HF‐related conditions. In 48 of the 60 alerts, the clinician was not previously aware of the condition. Of these 48 alerts, 43 triggered clinical actions. The rate of alerts judged nonclinically meaningful was 0.37/patient‐year, and the rate of hospitalizations not associated with an alert was 0.05/patient‐year. Centers performed remote follow‐up assessments of 1113 scheduled monthly transmissions (10.3/patient‐year) and 100 alerts (0.93/patient‐year). Monthly remote data review allowed to detect 11 (1%) HF events requiring clinical actions (vs 43% actionable alerts, P < .001).Conclusions: HeartLogic allowed relevant HF‐related clinical conditions to be identified remotely and enabled effective clinical actions to be taken; the rates of unexplained alerts and undetected HF events were low. An alert‐based management strategy seemed more efficient than a scheduled monthly remote follow‐up scheme.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intrahospital organizational model of remote monitoring data sharing, for a global management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a document of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac PacingJournal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2020
- Remote management of heart failure using implantable electronic devicesEuropean Heart Journal, 2017
- Daily remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: insights from the pooled patient-level data from three randomized controlled trials (IN-TIME, ECOST, TRUST)European Heart Journal, 2017
- A Multisensor Algorithm Predicts Heart Failure Events in Patients With Implanted DevicesJACC: Heart Failure, 2017
- Effects of Remote Monitoring on Clinical Outcomes and use of Healthcare Resources in Heart Failure Patients with Biventricular Defibrillators: Results of the More-Care Multicentre Randomized Controlled TrialEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2016
- 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failureEuropean Heart Journal, 2016
- HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devicesHeart Rhythm, 2015
- Workflow, time and patient satisfaction from the perspectives of Home MonitoringEP Europace, 2013
- Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring, Audible Patient Alerts, and Outcome in Patients With Heart FailureCirculation, 2011
- Sensitivity and positive predictive value of implantable intrathoracic impedance monitoring as a predictor of heart failure hospitalizations: the SENSE-HF trialEuropean Heart Journal, 2011