Characterising Jupiter's dynamo radius using its magnetic energy spectrum
Authors:
Preprint
Abstract
Jupiter's magnetic field is generated by the convection of liquid metallic hydrogen in its interior. The transition from molecular hydrogen to metallic hydrogen as temperature and pressure increase is believed to be a smooth one. As a result, the electrical conductivity in Jupiter varies continuously from being negligible at the surface to a large value in the deeper region. Thus, unlike the Earth where the upper boundary of the dynamo---the dynamo radius---is definitively located at the core-mantle boundary, it is not clear at what depth dynamo action becomes significant in Jupiter. In this paper, using a numerical model of the Jovian dynamo, we examine the magnetic energy spectrum at different depth and identify a dynamo radius below which (and away from the deep inner core) the shape of the magnetic energy spectrum becomes invariant. We find that this shift in the behaviour of the magnetic energy spectrum signifies a change in the dynamics of the system as electric current becomes important. Traditionally, a characteristic radius derived from the Lowes--Mauersberger spectrum---the Lowes radius---gives a good estimate to the Earth's core-mantle boundary. We argue that in our model, the Lowes radius provides a lower bound to the dynamo radius. We also compare the Lowes--Mauersberger spectrum in our model to that obtained from recent Juno observations. The Lowes radius derived from the Juno data is significantly lower than that obtained from our models. The existence of a stably stratified region in the neighbourhood of the transition zone might provide an explanation of this result.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anelastic torsional oscillations in Jupiter's metallic hydrogen regionEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2019
- A New Model of Jupiter's Magnetic Field From Juno's First Nine OrbitsGeophysical Research Letters, 2018
- Zonal flow magnetic field interaction in the semi-conducting region of giant planetsIcarus, 2017
- Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute coreGeophysical Research Letters, 2017
- Modeling the Jovian magnetic field and its secular variation using all available magnetic field observationsJournal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 2016
- A dynamo model of Jupiter’s magnetic fieldIcarus, 2014
- A new model for the (geo)magnetic power spectrum, with application to planetary dynamo radiiEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2014
- Explaining Jupiter's magnetic field and equatorial jet dynamicsGeophysical Research Letters, 2014
- Anelastic convection-driven dynamo benchmarksIcarus, 2011
- Constraints on deep-seated zonal winds inside Jupiter and SaturnIcarus, 2008