Generating Boolean networks with a prescribed attractor structure
Authors:
- Ranadip PalRPRanadip Pal
- Ivan IvanovIIIvan Ivanov
- Aniruddha DattaADAniruddha Datta
- Michael L. BittnerMBMichael L. Bittner
- Edward R. DoughertyEDEdward R. Dougherty
Open Access
- 8 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 21 (21) , 4021-4025
Abstract
Motivation: Dynamical modeling of gene regulation via network models constitutes a key problem for genomics. The long-run characteristics of a dynamical system are critical and their determination is a primary aspect of system analysis. In the other direction, system synthesis involves constructing a network possessing a given set of properties. This constitutes the inverse problem. Generally, the inverse problem is ill-posed, meaning there will be many networks, or perhaps none, possessing the desired properties. Relative to long-run behavior, we may wish to construct networks possessing a desirable steady-state distribution. This paper addresses the long-run inverse problem pertaining to Boolean networks (BNs). Results: The long-run behavior of a BN is characterized by its attractors. The rest of the state transition diagram is partitioned into level sets, the j-th level set being composed of all states that transition to one of the attractor states in exactly j transitions. We present two algorithms for the attractor inverse problem. The attractors are specified, and the sizes of the predictor sets and the number of levels are constrained. Algorithm complexity and performance are analyzed. The algorithmic solutions have immediate application. Under the assumption that sampling is from the steady state, a basic criterion for checking the validity of a designed network is that there should be concordance between the attractor states of the model and the data states. This criterion can be used to test a design algorithm: randomly select a set of states to be used as data states; generate a BN possessing the selected states as attractors, perhaps with some added requirements such as constraints on the number of predictors and the level structure; apply the design algorithm; and check the concordance between the attractor states of the designed network and the data states. Availability: The software and supplementary material is available at http://gsp.tamu.edu/Publications/BNs/bn.htm Contact:edward@ee.tamu.eduKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Steady-state probabilities for attractors in probabilistic Boolean networksSignal Processing, 2005
- A Bayesian connectivity-based approach to constructing probabilistic gene regulatory networksBioinformatics, 2004
- On Learning Gene Regulatory Networks Under the Boolean Network ModelMachine Learning, 2003
- From Boolean to probabilistic Boolean networks as models of genetic regulatory networksProceedings of the IEEE, 2002
- CAN MARKOV CHAIN MODELS MIMIC BIOLOGICAL REGULATION?Journal of Biological Systems, 2002
- Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profilingNature, 2000