Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 8 April 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 26 (8-9) , 855-870
Abstract
Background: More than 100 studies document disparities in patient portal use among vulnerable populations. Developing and testing strategies to reduce disparities in use is essential to ensure portals benefit all populations.Objective: To systematically review the impact of interventions designed to: (1) increase portal use or predictors of use in vulnerable patient populations, or (2) reduce disparities in use.Materials and Methods: A librarian searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Reviews for studies published before September 1, 2018. Two reviewers independently selected English-language research articles that evaluated any interventions designed to impact an eligible outcome. One reviewer extracted data and categorized interventions, then another assessed accuracy. Two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias.Results: Out of 18 included studies, 15 (83%) assessed an intervention's impact on portal use, 7 (39%) on predictors of use, and 1 (6%) on disparities in use. Most interventions studied focused on the individual (13 out of 26, 50%), as opposed to facilitating conditions, such as the tool, task, environment, or organization (SEIPS model). Twelve studies (67%) reported a statistically significant increase in portal use or predictors of use, or reduced disparities. Five studies (28%) had high or unclear risk of bias.Conclusion: Individually focused interventions have the most evidence for increasing portal use in vulnerable populations. Interventions affecting other system elements (tool, task, environment, organization) have not been sufficiently studied to draw conclusions. Given the well-established evidence for disparities in use and the limited research on effective interventions, research should move beyond identifying disparities to systematically addressing them at multiple levels.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Library of Medicine (R01LM012964, T15LM007079)
- National Institute of Nursing Research (R00NR016275)
- Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS21816)
This publication has 127 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bridging the Digital Divide in Diabetes: Family Support and Implications for Health LiteracyDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2011
- Rapid progress or lengthy process? electronic personal health records in mental healthBMC Psychiatry, 2011
- Use of an Electronic Patient Portal Among Disadvantaged PopulationsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2011
- Disparities in Enrollment and Use of an Electronic Patient PortalJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2011
- Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond accessJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- The Literacy Divide: Health Literacy and the Use of an Internet-Based Patient Portal in an Integrated Health System—Results from the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)Journal of Health Communication, 2010
- Patients’ attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative studyBMJ, 2008
- Recruiting Vulnerable Populations into Research: A Systematic Review of Recruitment InterventionsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS modelQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006
- THE INVERSE CARE LAWThe Lancet, 1971