Evaluating key characteristics of ideal colorectal cancer screening modalities: the microsimulation approach
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 94 (2) , 379-390.e7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Krebsliga Schweiz (KFS-2977-08-2012)
- Helmut Horten Stiftung
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerGastroenterology, 2012
- Random comparison of repeated faecal immunochemical testing at different intervals for population-based colorectal cancer screeningGut, 2012
- Colonoscopy versus Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Colorectal-Cancer ScreeningNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2012
- Clarifying Differences in Natural History between Models of ScreeningMedical Decision Making, 2011
- Diagnostic Yield Improves With Collection of 2 Samples in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Without Affecting AttendanceClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2011
- The Kidney Evaluation and Awareness Program in Sheffield (KEAPS): A Community-Based Screening for Microalbuminuria in a British PopulationNephron Clinical Practice, 2010
- Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2010
- Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2009
- Comparing Attendance and Detection Rate of Colonoscopy With Sigmoidoscopy and FIT for Colorectal Cancer ScreeningGastroenterology, 2007