Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in bicuspid compared to trileaflet aortic valves
- 1 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
- Vol. 20 (1) , 50-56
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve ReplacementNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approachesNature Reviews Cardiology, 2011
- A Modification of the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measures Into a Point System for Hospital Death Using Administrative DataMedical Care, 2009
- Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology and Interventions in the YoungJACC, 2007
- A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimensThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2007
- Frequency of Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Young Male Conscripts by EchocardiogramThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Frequency by Decades of Unicuspid, Bicuspid, and Tricuspid Aortic Valves in Adults Having Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis, With or Without Associated Aortic RegurgitationCirculation, 2005
- The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Why does it fail?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valveHeart, 2000
- Risk factors for aortic dissection: A necropsy study of 161 casesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984