Novel Sheep Model to Assess Critical-Sized Bone Regeneration with Periosteum for In Vivo Bioreactors
Authors:
- Yohaann A. GhoshYGYohaann A. Ghosh
- Hai XinHXHai Xin
- D.S. Abdullah Al MarufDMD.S. Abdullah Al Maruf
- Kai ChengKCKai Cheng
- Innes WiseIWInnes Wise
- Chris BurrowsCBChris Burrows
- Ruta GuptaRGRuta Gupta
- Veronica Ka-Yan CheungVCVeronica Ka-Yan Cheung
- James WykesJWJames Wykes
- David LeinkramDLDavid Leinkram
- Catriona FroggattCFCatriona Froggatt
- Will LewinWLWill Lewin
- 1 April 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods
- Vol. 30 (4) , 159-169
Abstract
Considerable research is being undertaken to develop novel biomaterials-based approaches for surgical reconstruction of bone defects. This extends to three-dimensional (3D) printed materials that provide stable, structural, and functional support in vivo . However, few preclinical models can simulate in vivo human biological conditions for clinically relevant testing. In this study we describe a novel ovine model that allows evaluation of in vivo osteogenesis via contact with bone and/or periosteum interfaced with printed polymer bioreactors loaded with biomaterial bone substitutes. The infraspinous scapular region of 14 Dorset cross sheep was exposed. Vascularized periosteum was elevated either attached to the infraspinatus muscle or separately. In both cases, the periosteum was supplied by the periosteal branch of the circumflex scapular vessels. In eight sheep, a 3D printed 4-chambered polyetheretherketone bioreactor was wrapped circumferentially in vascularized periosteum. In 6 sheep, 12 double-sided 3D printed 2-chambered polyetherketone bioreactors were secured to the underlying bone allowing direct contact with the bone on one side and periosteum on the other. Our model enabled simultaneous testing of up to 24 (12 double-sided) 10 × 10 × 5 mm bioreactors per scapula in the flat contact approach or a single 40 × 10 mm four-chambered bioreactor per scapula using the periosteal wrap. De novo bone growth was evaluated using histological and radiological analysis. Of importance, the experimental model was well tolerated by the animals and provides a versatile approach for comparing the osteogenic potential of cambium on the bone surface and elevated with periosteum. Furthermore, the periosteal flaps were sufficiently large for encasing bioreactors containing biomaterial bone substitutes for applications such as segmental mandibular reconstruction.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bone Regeneration Exploiting Corticoperiosteal Tissue Transfer for Scaffold-Guided Bone RegenerationTissue Engineering Part C: Methods, 2022
- Health-related quality of life in maxillectomy patients undergoing dentoalveolar rehabilitationOral Oncology, 2022
- Reconsidering Osteoconduction in the Era of Additive ManufacturingTissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 2019
- Repair of a critical‐size segmental rabbit femur defect using bioglass‐β‐TCP monoblock, a vascularized periosteal flap and BMP‐2Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2017
- Guide to Ruminant Anatomy2017
- Aging periosteal progenitor cells have reduced regenerative responsiveness to bone injury and to the anabolic actions of PTH 1-34 treatmentBone, 2014
- Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: Molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approachesJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2012
- Predictors of morbidity following free flap reconstruction for cancer of the head and neckHead & Neck, 2007
- A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defectsJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1997
- OSTEOGENETIC POTENCY AND NEW-BONE FORMATION BY INDUCTION IN TRANSPLANTS TO THE ANTERIOR CHAMBER OF THE EYEJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1952