Health equity: evidence synthesis and knowledge translation methods
Authors:
- Vivian A WelchVWVivian A Welch
- Mark PetticrewMPMark Petticrew
- Jennifer O’nEillJOJennifer O’nEill
- Elizabeth WatersEWElizabeth Waters
- Rebecca ArmstrongRARebecca Armstrong
- Zulfiqar A BhuttaZBZulfiqar A Bhutta
- Damian FrancisDFDamian Francis
- Tracey Perez KoehlmoosTKTracey Perez Koehlmoos
- Elizabeth KristjanssonEKElizabeth Kristjansson
- Tomas PantojaTPTomas Pantoja
- Peter TugwellPTPeter Tugwell
Open Access
- 22 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
At the Rio Summit in 2011 on Social Determinants of Health, the global community recognized a pressing need to take action on reducing health inequities. This requires an improved evidence base on the effects of national and international policies on health inequities. Although systematic reviews are recognized as an important source for evidence-informed policy, they have been criticized for failing to assess effects on health equity. This article summarizes guidance on both conducting systematic reviews with a focus on health equity and on methods to translate their findings to different audiences. This guidance was developed based on a series of methodology meetings, previous guidance, a recently developed reporting guideline for equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-Equity 2012) and a systematic review of methods to assess health equity in systematic reviews. We make ten recommendations for conducting equity-focused systematic reviews; and five considerations for knowledge translation. Illustrative examples of equity-focused reviews are provided where these methods have been used. Implementation of the recommendations in this article is one step toward monitoring the impact of national and international policies and programs on health equity, as recommended by the 2011 World Conference on Social Determinants of Health.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomesCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013
- Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomesCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013
- What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping reviewBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012
- Interventions for preventing obesity in childrenCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011
- How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventionsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010
- Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000–10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survivalThe Lancet, 2010
- Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviewsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic reviewTobacco Control, 2008
- Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmesBMJ, 2007
- “Profits before people”? A systematic review of the health and safety impacts of privatising public utilities and industries in developed countriesJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2007