Reconnecting stranded public lands is a win-win for conservation and people
Authors:
- L. Claire PowersLPL. Claire Powers
- Ashley E. LarsenALAshley E. Larsen
- Bryan LeonardBLBryan Leonard
- Andrew J. PlantingaAPAndrew J. Plantinga
- 21 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Biological Conservation
- Vol. 270
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (DEB 2042526)
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (AWD00035948)
- University of Colorado Boulder
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planningBiological Reviews, 2012
- Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United StatesConservation Letters, 2012
- Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia PlateauPLOS ONE, 2011
- Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent DeclinesScience, 2010
- Incorporating asymmetric connectivity into spatial decision making for conservationConservation Letters, 2010
- Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time‐delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levelsEcology Letters, 2010
- High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected AreasPLOS ONE, 2009
- Going, Going, Gone: Is Animal Migration DisappearingPLOS Biology, 2008
- An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic developmentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Consequences of changing biodiversityNature, 2000