Validation of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Motor Score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) Motor Score
Authors:
- Masahiko TsuboMTMasahiko Tsubo
- Shinsuke KatohSKShinsuke Katoh
- Yasser H. S. El MiliguiYMYasser H. S. El Miligui
- Ameen KhanAKAmeen Khan
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 21 (5) , 614-619
Abstract
In this study the motor scores of 62 consecutive acute spinal cord-injured patients were retrospectively reviewed. The reliability of the American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores, compared with the conventional motor scores, was retrospectively assessed. The reliability of the American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study scores has not as yet been confirmed. Sixty-two consecutive adult patients admitted within 7 days of acute spinal cord injury between April, 1983, and September, 1992, were evaluated. The motor deficit percentage and the motor recovery percentage of each of the American Spinal Injury Association and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores were compared with those of the conventional motor score. From the initial and final motor score, the motor deficit percentage and motor recovery percentage were calculated. There were 38 patients with cervical and thoracic lesions, 12 patients with dorso-lumbar lesions, and 12 patients with lower lumbar lesions. The average follow-up period was 41 months. Both the American Spinal Injury Association motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor score were representative of the conventional motor score for the evaluation of the motor deficit percentage and the motor recovery percentage in all levels (P < 0.0001). The differences in all correlation coefficients between the American Spinal Injury Association motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor score were not statistically significant in all levels and in every group. The American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores can both be used for the neurological quantification of motor deficit and motor recovery.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The International Standards Booklet for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord InjurySpinal Cord, 1994
- Methylprednisolone or naloxone treatment after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow-up dataJournal of Neurosurgery, 1992
- Methylprednisolone and neurological function 1 year after spinal cord injuryJournal of Neurosurgery, 1985
- Efficacy of Methylprednisolone in Acute Spinal Cord InjuryJAMA, 1984
- A scale for evaluation of spinal cord injuryJournal of Neurosurgery, 1981
- Relationship between neurological and functional status after acute spinal cord injury: An epidemiological studyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1980
- The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegiaSpinal Cord, 1969