Maximizing kidneys for transplantation using machine perfusion
Open Access
- 1 October 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 95 (40) , e5083
Abstract
The two main options for renal allograft preservation are static cold storage (CS) and machine perfusion (MP). There has been considerably increased interest in MP preservation of kidneys, however conflicting evidence regarding its efficacy and associated costs have impacted its scale of clinical uptake. Additionally, there is no clear consensus regarding oxygenation, and hypo- or normothermia, in conjunction with MP, and its mechanisms of action are also debated. The primary aims of this article were to elucidate the benefits of MP preservation with and without oxygenation, and/or under normothermic conditions, when compared with CS prior to deceased donor kidney transplantation. Clinical (observational studies and prospective trials) and animal (experimental) articles exploring the use of renal MP were assessed (EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases). Meta-analyses were conducted for the comparisons between hypothermic MP (hypothermic machine perfusion [HMP]) and CS (human studies) and normothermic MP (warm (normothermic) perfusion [WP]) compared with CS or HMP (animal studies). The primary outcome was allograft function. Secondary outcomes included graft and patient survival, acute rejection and parameters of tubular, glomerular and endothelial function. Subgroup analyses were conducted in expanded criteria (ECD) and donation after circulatory (DCD) death donors. A total of 101 studies (63 human and 38 animal) were included. There was a lower rate of delayed graft function in recipients with HMP donor grafts compared with CS kidneys (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69–0.87). Primary nonfunction (PNF) was reduced in ECD kidneys preserved by HMP (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09–0.89). Renal function in animal studies was significantly better in WP kidneys compared with both HMP (standardized mean difference [SMD] of peak creatinine 1.66; 95% CI 3.19 to 0.14) and CS (SMD of peak creatinine 1.72; 95% CI 3.09 to 0.34). MP improves renal preservation through the better maintenance of tubular, glomerular, and endothelial function and integrity. HMP improves short-term outcomes after renal transplantation, with a less clear effect in the longer-term. There is considerable room for modification of the process to assess whether superior outcomes can be achieved through oxygenation, perfusion fluid manipulation, and alteration of perfusion temperature. In particular, correlative experimental (animal) data provides strong support for more clinical trials investigating normothermic MP.Keywords
This publication has 136 references indexed in Scilit:
- Benefits of active oxygenation during hypothermic machine perfusion of kidneys in a preclinical model of deceased after cardiac death donorsJournal of Surgical Research, 2013
- Persufflation (or gaseous oxygen perfusion) as a method of organ preservationCryobiology, 2012
- The global role of kidney transplantationThe Lancet, 2012
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Renoprotective effect of pulsatile perfusion machine RM3: pathophysiological and kidney injury biomarker characterization in a preclinical model of autotransplanted pigBJU International, 2011
- Machine Perfusion Versus Cold Storage for the Preservation of Kidneys Donated After Cardiac DeathAnnals of Surgery, 2010
- The Alphabet Soup of Kidney TransplantationClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- Association of Lower Costs of Pulsatile Machine Perfusion in Renal Transplantation from Expanded Criteria DonorsAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2008
- Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysisTrials, 2007
- Transplantation of Kidneys from Donors Whose Hearts Have Stopped BeatingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998