Comparing One-Stage vs Two-Stage Approaches for the Management of Choledocholithiasis
Authors:
- 20 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Vol. 27 (3) , 534-543
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones2013
- The Choice of Primary Repair or Mesh Repair for Paraesophageal HerniaAnnals of Surgery, 2013
- Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stonesHPB, 2012
- Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trialSurgical Endoscopy, 2012
- Two-stagevssingle-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stonesWorld Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stonesBritish Journal of Surgery, 2011
- A Randomized, Clinical Trial to Compare Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Subsequent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Primary Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration During Cholecystectomy in Higher Risk Patients with CholedocholithiasisJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2009
- Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: A combined endoscopic–laparoscopic techniqueInternational Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Management of Preoperatively Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Decision AnalysisJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2008
- Correlation of Patient-Derived Utility Values and Quality of Life after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic CancerJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2006