Prognostic Factors for Successful Recovery After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Literature Review
Authors:
- Nienke WolterbeekNWNienke Wolterbeek
- Ronald N. WesselRWRonald N. Wessel
- Jean-Pierre BaeyensJBJean-Pierre Baeyens
- Rob A. de BieRBRob A. de Bie
- 1 March 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
- Vol. 44 (3) , 153-163
Abstract
Study Design: Systematic literature review. Objectives: To perform a systematic review of the literature on prognostic factors for successful recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Background: Rotator cuff lesion is a common shoulder disorder, with a prevalence ranging from 13% in people over 50 years of age to more than 50% in people over 80 years of age. Several factors can affect the extent to which a person will recover after the surgical repair of a rotator cuff tear. More knowledge about these prognostic factors may lead to a better understanding of why the recovery process is successful in some patients but not in others. Methods: A systematic literature search from 1995 to November 2013 was performed to identify studies reporting prognostic factors for successful recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Results: A total of 455 studies were initially identified, 10 of which were included in the review. For all included studies, the percentage of patients with complete tendon healing at final assessment ranged from 60% to 88%. Twelve prognostic factors, which could be divided into 4 categories, were identified as being associated with better recovery: demographic factors (younger age, male gender), clinical factors (higher bone mineral density, absence of diabetes mellitus, higher level of sports activity, greater preoperative range of motion, absence of obesity), factors related to cuff integrity (smaller sagittal size of the cuff lesion, less retraction of the cuff, less fatty infiltration, no multiple tendon involvement), and factors related to the surgical procedure (no concomitant biceps or acromioclavicular joint procedures). Conclusion: Knowledge and understanding of prognostic factors should be used in the decision-making process concerning arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to offer better care to patients. Level of Evidence: Prognosis, level 2a-. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014;44(3):153–163. Epub 22 January 2014. doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.4832Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraoperative Determinants of Rotator Cuff Repair IntegrityThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012
- Quality of Life After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff RepairThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011
- Factors Affecting Rotator Cuff Healing After Arthroscopic RepairThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011
- Functional Recovery Period after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Is it Predictable Before Surgery?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Does the Upward Migration Index Predict Function and Quality of Life in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general populationJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2010
- Prospective analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Prognostic factors affecting clinical and ultrasound outcomeJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2009
- The Factors Affecting the Clinical Outcome and Integrity of Arthroscopically Repaired Rotator Cuff Tears of the ShoulderClinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2009
- Do Outcomes Differ after Rotator Cuff Repair for Patients Receiving Workers' Compensation?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff RepairClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001