Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2015
- journal article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in The Bone & Joint Journal
- Vol. 97-B (2) , 147-149
Abstract
Revision knee arthroplasty presents a number of challenges, not least of which is obtaining solid primary fixation of implants into host bone. Three anatomical zones exist within both femur and tibia which can be used to support revision implants. These consist of the joint surface or epiphysis, the metaphysis and the diaphysis. The methods by which fixation in each zone can be obtained are discussed. The authors suggest that solid fixation should be obtained in at least two of the three zones and emphasise the importance of pre-operative planning and implant selection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:147–9.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why are Total Knee Arthroplasties Being Revised?The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2013
- Reason for Revision TKA Predicts Clinical Outcome: Prospective Evaluation of 150 Consecutive Patients With 2-years FollowupClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2013
- Articularis Genus: An Anatomic and MRI Study in CadaversJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2012
- Modified Hybrid Stem Fixation in Revision TKA is Durable at 2 to 10 YearsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Initial stability of type-2 tibial defect treatmentsProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2009
- Infection Associated with Prosthetic JointsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Primary and Revision Arthroplasty Surgery Caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2009
- Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2007
- Modular, Mobile-Bearing Hinge Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001
- Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2000