Measuring Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering: Test-retest Reliability Revisited

Authors:
  • EAElizabeth Fisher Aliveto
    Elizabeth Fisher Aliveto
  • CRChelsea Kuhn Roche
    Chelsea Kuhn Roche
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Previous studies of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (PO-SHA-S), using test and retest designs in modest-sized samples, have reported satisfactory test-retest reliability, i.e., correlations of about 0.80. Simultaneously, lower but moderate correlations between different first and second test respondents were observed and hypothesized to represent unspecified "societal" influences on stuttering attitudes. This study sought to clarify this and other potential relationships between first and second tests with the PO-SHA-S in a large, geographically and linguistically diverse sample. Methods: POSHA-S Overall Stuttering Scores (OSSs) of 345 respondents from 12 test-retest samples from four countries and languages, with no intervening interventions, were analyzed with correlations and by grouping respondents according to whose stuttering attitudes improved, remained the same, or worsened from test to retest. Results: Test and retest OSSs generally conformed to normal distributions and were not significantly different. Correlations between first versus second tests replicated earlier research. However, when the degree and direction of change from test to retest was considered, both in other correlations and in sorts of respondents, unexpected results emerged. Respondents with intermediate attitudes changed minimally, while those with most and least positive attitudes at the first test changed in opposite directions past the overall mean at second test. Conclusions: While demonstrating adequate test-retest reliability correlations on the POSHA-S, public attitudes were found to be less stable than previously assumed.

This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit: