Restoration Survival: Revisiting Patients' Risk Factors Through a Systematic Literature Review
- 1 September 2016
- journal article
- Published by Operative Dentistry in Operative Dentistry
- Vol. 41 (S7) , S7-S26
Abstract
SUMMARY: A literature review was conducted to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on restoration survival in posterior permanent teeth as well as to report the methods used to collect these factors. The selection of articles on longitudinal clinical studies investigating the survival of posterior restorations (except full crowns and temporary fillings) and including patient-related factors was performed by applying predefined criteria. The review was organized into two parts, the first describing how patient factors were assessed in the studies (n=45) and the second presenting the statistical significance (n=27) and size of the effect (n=11) of these factors on restoration survival. Patient-related factors mentioned in the studies included age; gender; caries risk; caries activity/severity; decayed, missing, filled teeth; number of restorations; oral hygiene; and bruxism, among others. Sixteen studies included the patient age or age range in the analysis, which was found to be significant in 47% of the studies. Regarding gender, four of 17 reports found a significant effect on survival, showing more failures for men in three studies. The caries risk profile or related variables were included in the analysis of 15 studies, and a significant effect on survival was reported for high-caries-risk individuals (or related variables) in 67% of these studies. Bruxism was also found to influence restoration survival in three of six studies where this variable was investigated. Some issues were found regarding the reporting of methods used to classify patients according to risk and were thoroughly discussed. In view of the information gathered in this review, the assessment of patient factors along with other variables should become part of clinical studies investigating restoration survival, since several of these factors were shown to influence the failure of restorations, regardless of the material type.Keywords
This publication has 90 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of dental visiting trajectory patterns on clinical oral health and oral health‐related quality of lifeJournal of Public Health Dentistry, 2011
- 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristicsDental Materials, 2011
- Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: A 12-year follow-upJournal of Dentistry, 2010
- Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Placed by Dental Students of Kuwait UniversityMedical Principles and Practice, 2010
- A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Five-year resultsJournal of Dentistry, 2009
- The effect of occlusal restoration and loading on the development of abfraction lesions: A finite element studyJournal of Conservative Dentistry, 2008
- Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavitiesJournal of Dentistry, 2007
- Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluationClinical Oral Investigations, 2003
- Performance of tunnel restorations at 3–6yearsJournal of Dentistry, 2000
- Minimal intervention dentistry — a reviewInternational Dental Journal, 2000