Long‐term neurological morbidity among children delivered by vacuum extraction ‐ a national cohort study
Open Access
- 5 April 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 102 (7) , 843-853
Abstract
Introduction: This is the first nationwide cohort study of vacuum extraction (VE) and long‐term neurological morbidity. We hypothesized that VE per se, and not only complicated labor, can cause intracranial bleedings, which could further cause neurological long‐term morbidity. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of neonatal mortality, cerebral palsy (CP), and epilepsy among children delivered by VE in a long‐term perspective.Material and methods: The study population included 1 509 589 term singleton children planned for vaginal birth in Sweden (January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2017). We investigated the risk of neonatal death (ND), CP, and epilepsy among children delivered by VE (successful or failed) and compared their risks with those born by spontaneous vaginal birth and emergency cesarean section (ECS). We used logistic regression to study the adjusted associations with each outcome. The follow‐up time was from birth until December 31, 2019.Results: The percentage and total number of children with the outcomes were ND (0.04%, n = 616), CP (0.12%, n = 1822), and epilepsy (0.74%, n = 11 190). Compared with children delivered by ECS, those born by VE had no increased risk of ND, but there was an increased risk for those born after failed VE (adj OR 2.23 [1.33–3.72]). The risk of CP was similar among children born by VE and those born spontaneously vaginally. Further, the risk of CP was similar among children born after failed VE compared with ECS. The risk of epilepsy was not increased among children born by VE (successful/failed), compared with those who had spontaneous vaginal birth or ECS.Conclusions: The outcomes ND, CP, and epilepsy are rare. In this nationwide cohort study, children born after successful VE had no increased risk of ND, CP or epilepsy compared with those delivered by ECS, but there was an increased risk of ND among those born by failed VE. Concerning the studied outcomes, VE appears to be a safe obstetric intervention; however, it requires a thorough risk assessment and awareness of when to convert to ECS.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and ObstetriciansEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2011
- External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient registerBMC Public Health, 2011
- Caesarean section in the second stage of labour: A retrospective review of obstetric setting and morbidityJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010
- Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfallsBMJ, 2009
- Neonatal Complications of Vacuum-Assisted DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Frequency and natural history of subdural haemorrhages in babies and relation to obstetric factorsThe Lancet, 2004
- Neonatal Subgaleal Hemorrhage and Its Relationship to Delivery by Vacuum ExtractionObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2003
- Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort studyThe Lancet, 2001
- Effect of Mode of Delivery in Nulliparous Women on Neonatal Intracranial InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- A Quality Study of a Medical Birth RegistryScandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 1990