SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Responses in Various Populations, at the Time of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Virus Emergence: Evaluation of Two Surrogate Neutralization Assays in Front of Whole Virus Neutralization Test
Authors:
- Stephane MarotSMStephane Marot
- Djeneba Bocar FofanaDFDjeneba Bocar Fofana
- Philippe FlandrePFPhilippe Flandre
- Isabelle MaletIMIsabelle Malet
- Karen ZafilazaKZKaren Zafilaza
- Valentin LeducqVLValentin Leducq
- Diane VivienDVDiane Vivien
- Sarah MrabetSMSarah Mrabet
- Corentin PoignonCPCorentin Poignon
- Vincent CalvezVCVincent Calvez
- Laurence Morand-JoubertLMLaurence Morand-Joubert
- Anne-Geneviève MarcelinAMAnne-Geneviève Marcelin
Open Access
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies response is the best indicator of effective protection after infection and/or vaccination, but its evaluation requires tedious cell-based experiments using an infectious virus. We analyzed, in 105 patients with various histories of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination, the neutralizing response using a virus neutralization test (VNT) against B.1, Alpha, Beta and Omicron variants, and compared the results with two surrogate assays based on antibody-mediated blockage of the ACE2-RBD interaction (Lateral Flow Boditech and ELISA Genscript). The strongest response was observed for recovered COVID-19 patients receiving one vaccine dose. Naïve patients receiving 2 doses of mRNA vaccine also demonstrate high neutralization titers against B.1, Alpha and Beta variants, but only 34.3% displayed a neutralization activity against the Omicron variant. On the other hand, non-infected patients with half vaccination schedules displayed a weak and inconstant activity against all isolates. Non-vaccinated COVID-19 patients kept a neutralizing activity against B.1 and Alpha up to 12 months after recovery but a decreased activity against Beta and Omicron. Both surrogate assays displayed a good correlation with the VNT. However, an adaptation of the cut-off positivity was necessary, especially for the most resistant Beta and Omicron variants. We validated two simple and reliable surrogate neutralization assays, which may favorably replace cell-based methods, allowing functional analysis on a larger scale.Keywords
Funding Information
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche sur le SIDA et les Maladies Infectieuses Emergentes (ANRS MIE)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection rescues B and T cell responses to variants after first vaccine doseScience, 2021
- Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody responses and duration of immunity: a longitudinal studyThe Lancet Microbe, 2021
- Sensitivity of infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants to neutralizing antibodiesNature Medicine, 2021
- Effect of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection on humoral and T-cell responses to single-dose BNT162b2 vaccineThe Lancet, 2021
- Rapid decline of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among infected healthcare workersNature Communications, 2021
- Suitability of two rapid lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for predicting SARS‐CoV‐2 neutralizing activity of seraJournal of Medical Virology, 2020
- Serological Assays Estimate Highly Variable SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Activity in Recovered COVID-19 PatientsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Weak correlation between antibody titers and neutralizing activity in sera from SARS‐CoV‐2 infected subjectsJournal of Medical Virology, 2020
- A SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test based on antibody-mediated blockage of ACE2–spike protein–protein interactionNature Biotechnology, 2020
- SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controlsNature, 2020