Wearable cuffless blood pressure monitoring devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 2 May 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal - Digital Health
- Vol. 3 (2) , 323-337
Abstract
High blood pressure (BP) is the commonest modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, yet its monitoring remains problematic. Wearable cuffless BP devices offer potential solutions; however, little is known about their validity and utility. We aimed to systematically review the validity, features and clinical use of wearable cuffless BP devices. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE Xplore and the Cochrane Database till December 2019 for studies that reported validating cuffless BP devices. We extracted information about study characteristics, device features, validation processes, and clinical applications. Devices were classified according to their functions and features. We defined devices with a mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) biases of 2 95.4%) and DBP (pooled mean=1.16 mmHg, 95%CI -1.26, 3.58, I2 87.1%). Several cuffless BP devices are currently available using different technologies, offering the potential for continuous BP monitoring. The variation in standards and validation protocols limited the comparability of findings across studies and the identification of the most accurate device. Challenges such as validation using standard protocols and in real-life settings must be overcome before they can be recommended for uptake into clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nocturnal Hypertension or Nondipping: Which Is Better Associated With the Cardiovascular Risk Profile?American Journal of Hypertension, 2013
- Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in Rural and Urban Communities in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income CountriesJAMA, 2013
- Exercise Training for Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysisJournal of the American Heart Association, 2013
- Comparison of two measuring instruments, B-pro and SphygmoCor system as reference, to evaluate central systolic blood pressure and radial augmentation indexHypertension Research, 2012
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic reviewBMJ, 2011
- Role of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Overcoming Therapeutic Inertia and Improving Hypertension ControlHypertension, 2011
- Ambulatory Blood-Pressure MonitoringNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects ModelJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2005
- Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariateStatistics in Medicine, 2003