Comparison of Thermophilic–Mesophilic and Mesophilic–Thermophilic Two-Phase High-Solid Sludge Anaerobic Digestion at Different Inoculation Proportions: Digestion Performance and Microbial Diversity
Open Access
- 27 September 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Microorganisms
- Vol. 11 (10) , 2409
Abstract
This study investigated the performance of thermophilic–mesophilic (T-M) and mesophilic–thermophilic (M-T) two-phase sludge anaerobic digestion at different inoculation proportions after a change in digestion temperature. After temperature change, the pH, total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), free ammonia nitrogen (FAN), solubility chemical oxygen demand (SCOD), and total alkalinity (TA) levels of two-phase digesters were between thermophilic control digesters and mesophilic control digesters. However, the volatile fatty acid (VFA) levels of two-phase digesters were higher than those of thermophilic or mesophilic control digesters. The bacteria communities of M-T two-phase digesters were more diverse than those of T-M. After a change in digestion temperature, the bacterial community was dominated by Coprothermobacter. After a change of digestion temperature, the relative abundance (RA) of Methanobacterium, Methanosaeta, and Methanospirillum of M-T two-phase digesters was higher than that of T-M two-phase digesters. In comparison, the RA of Methanosarcina of T-M two-phase digesters was higher than that of M-T two-phase digesters. The ultimate methane yields of thermophilic control digesters were greater than those of mesophilic control digesters. Nevertheless, the ultimate methane yield levels of M-T two-phase digesters were greater than those of T-M two-phase digesters. The ultimate methane yields of all two-phase digesters presented an earlier increase and later decrease trend with the increasing inoculation proportion. Optimal methane production condition was achieved when 15% of sludge (T-M15) was inoculated under mesophilic–thermophilic conditions, which promoted 123.6% (based on mesophilic control) or 27.4% (based on thermophilic control). An optimal inoculation proportion (about 15%) balanced the number and activity of methanogens of high-solid sludge anaerobic digestion.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (52360019, 51741805, 52060016, 42267017, 22JR5RA257)
- Province Natural Science Foundation of GanSu (52360019, 51741805, 52060016, 42267017, 22JR5RA257)
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Temperature on Biogas Production Efficiency and Microbial Community in a Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion SystemWater, 2019
- Two-phase high solid anaerobic digestion with dewatered sludge: Improved volatile solid degradation and specific methane generation by temperature and pH regulationBioresource Technology, 2018
- Instability mechanisms and early warning indicators for mesophilic anaerobic digestion of vegetable wasteBioresource Technology, 2017
- Methanogenic population dynamics regulated by bacterial community responses to protein-rich organic wastes in a high solid anaerobic digesterChemical Engineering Journal, 2017
- Effect of initial pH on anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cow manureWaste Management, 2015
- Ecology and biotechnological potential of the thermophilic fermentative Coprothermobacter spp.FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2015
- Metaproteomics of cellulose methanisation under thermophilic conditions reveals a surprisingly high proteolytic activityThe ISME Journal, 2013
- Syntrophic degradation of proteinaceous materials by the thermophilic strains Coprothermobacter proteolyticus and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicusJournal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2011
- Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludgeProgress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2008
- ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF SWINE MANURE: INHIBITION BY AMMONIAWater Research, 1998